Special Tribunal corrects judgment, exonerates Makhura

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Gauteng Premier David Makhura. Picture: Rosetta Msimango
Gauteng Premier David Makhura. Picture: Rosetta Msimango

NEWS


Gauteng Premier David Makhura has succeeded in persuading the Special Tribunal to amend parts of an affidavit which implicated him in personal protective equipment (PPE) procurement irregularities.

A judgment handed down by the Special Tribunal on Tuesday states that Makhura was correct in asserting that he did not provide names of companies which received PPE contracts and that it was the premier’s office instead that had been accused of this.

“I have, on receipt of the premier’s application, realised that the omission of the words ‘office of’ before ‘the premier’ and ‘the MEC’ in the judgment text is capable of being construed to mean that the tribunal has found or decided that it was the premier personally or the MEC personally who supplied the names. There was no such decision or finding made on the allegations,” the judgement by Judge Sewele Mothle reads.

“The application to insert the omitted words in paragraph 14 and 24 on the judgment in SIU v Ledla, dated December 10 2020, is granted,” the judge added.

It is quite clear that I have become an obstacle to the realisation of certain political ambitions and business agendas.
David Makhura

The tribunal handed down a judgement at the end of last year where former department of health chief financial officer Kabelo Lehloenya was seen to have been central to the awarding of an unlawful tender to Ledla Structural Development.

Read: Makhura denies involvement in the PPE contracts scandal

However, in her answering affidavit, where she contests the non- payment of her pension fund, Lehloenya implicates Makhura, former Gauteng health MEC Bandile Masuku and health head of department Mkhululi Lukhele.

Shortly after accusations implicating him emerged, Makhura wrote to the Special Tribunal requesting that it rectify an error which seemed to purport that he was linked to wrongdoing.

I am happy that the statement has been corrected, making it clear that there were no allegations made against my involvement in PPE procurement irregularities.
David Makhura

The premier also issued a statement wherein he implied that this could be a means to discredit him.

“For quite a while, I have been aware of an orchestrated campaign to tarnish my name with the ultimate objective to remove me from the Gauteng political scene. It is quite clear that I have become an obstacle to the realisation of certain political ambitions and business agendas.”

“I can confidently say that smear campaigns and the lies underpinning them will not succeed because the truth is more powerful and stubborn than political trickery,” he said.

The premier has welcomed the decision saying that he has been vindicated.

“I am happy that the statement has been corrected, making it clear that there were no allegations made against my involvement in PPE procurement irregularities,” Makhura said.


facebook
twitter
linkedin
instagram

Queenin Masuabi 

Political Journalist

+27 11 713 9001
Queenin.Masuabi@citypress.co.za
www.citypress.co.za
69 Kingsway Rd, Auckland Park
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24

E-Editions

Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Two years after André de Ruyter joined Eskom, South Africa is experiencing its worst bout of load shedding. Is he to blame?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
No, he got in late
82% - 37 votes
Yes
9% - 4 votes
Fire the whole lot
9% - 4 votes
Vote