Zuma lawyer: ‘Just a loan from a friend’

Former president Jacob Zuma speaks to his legal team in court. Picture: Themba Hadebe/Reuters
Former president Jacob Zuma speaks to his legal team in court. Picture: Themba Hadebe/Reuters

Zuma’s lawyer says no corruption was involved in exchange of money between his client and his financial adviser

Former president Jacob Zuma’s lawyer has dismissed the charges of fraud, money laundering, corruption and racketeering being faced by his client as a “simple exchange of money” between Zuma and “his friend”, one-time financial adviser Schabir Shaik.

Daniel Mantsha, who along with Muzi Sikhakhane and Thabani Masuku make up Zuma’s legal team, expressed these sentiments to City Press outside court on Friday after the conclusion of his client’s application to have the Pietermaritzburg division of the KwaZulu-Natal High Court grant him a stay of prosecution.

Zuma is in the dock on 16 charges of fraud, money laundering, corruption and racketeering linked to 783 payments that French company Thales allegedly made to him in connection with the infamous arms deal.

“Zuma’s first reaction was to ask that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) confirm whether it was investigating him or not. They didn’t confirm. They sent him questions, which he answered and explained that Schabir Shaik was his friend and he had loaned him money. Of course the state made a big issue and suggested corruption, bribery and racketeering was involved, but that was not the crux of the matter. What it boiled down to was that this was all about money advanced by Shaik to his friend and comrade, a person he was financially advising.

“There is not even a cent that was taken from the state coffers, there is nothing,” said Mantsha.

He added that Zuma had been given Shaik’s personal money and that he had been “on record until today maintaining that he gave it to Zuma as a brother in need and not in a corrupt manner”.

Mantsha sought to explain away accusations that included Shaik having allegedly paid R1.2 million to Zuma, then deputy president of the country, over a period of seven years.

The state argued that it was a means to induce Zuma to use his political influence to protect Shaik’s business interests.

Shaik was also accused of attempting to secure an annual bribe of R500 000 for Zuma from Thales.

However, Mantsha painted Zuma as “violated” and said he continued to suffer from the state’s prosecution of him.

“Zuma has been dirtied over decades. We’ve been told that he is corrupt and that has influenced some of us to see him not as a human being and I can tell you that he is feeling very bad about the continuation of this matter.”

Mantsha said the 77-year-old might come across as charismatic after proceedings, dancing and addressing crowds that had come to support him, but the trial was taking a toll on him.

“He is a father, grandfather, uncle and brother ... he has the same feelings that we have and because he has constantly been framed a certain way we have come to accept that it has influenced some of us to see him as less of a human being who has no feeling of shame,” said Mantsha.

Mantsha is himself no stranger to controversy. He was once disbarred and is still being probed by the Hawks for state capture allegations.

In 2007, he was allegedly struck off the roll of the Law Society of the Northern Provinces for several infractions, including allegations of embezzlement of funds, dishonesty and unprofessional behaviour, before being readmitted in 2011.

His comments came after the full bench of judges had heard closing arguments from the state, Thales and Zuma’s own legal team, which had also tried to introduce new evidence in the form of a letter, believed to be correspondence between the NPA and the Hawks, late on Thursday.

According to Zuma’s legal team, judgment on the permanent stay of prosecution application would be handed down in the next three months.

Should the judges rule against the application, Zuma and Thales will face a criminal trial scheduled for October 15.


Do you find Mantsha’s justification of Shaik’s ‘advance’ to Zuma plausible?

SMS us on 35697 using the keyword ZUMA and tell us what you think. Please include your name and province. SMSes cost R1.50. By participating, you agree to receive occasional marketing material

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24


Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Tourism Minister Lindiwe Sisulu’s comments on the Constitution and the judiciary has been termed an “extraordinary attack” that is “dangerous and regressive”. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
She’s within her rights
12% - 44 votes
It’s all politics
25% - 92 votes
It was irresponsible
64% - 237 votes