ANC MP contradicts party chief whip on Mkhwebane vote

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
ANC MP Mervyn Dirks says South Africans are unpatriotic, hence they vandalise their own infrastructure. Photo: Misheck Makora
ANC MP Mervyn Dirks says South Africans are unpatriotic, hence they vandalise their own infrastructure. Photo: Misheck Makora

Politics


The rules for the removal of a Chapter 9 head from office were not created for the Public Protector and therefore the rules do not apply retrospectively, “unless [they were] specifically created for Busisiwe Mkhwebane”.

This is according to outspoken ANC MP Mervyn Dirks as Parliament is this week expected to discuss the process to set up an inquiry into Mkhwebane’s fitness to hold office.

A recent report by a three-member panel of experts found prima facie evidence supporting the investigation and, in terms of the rules, National Assembly had to either reject or endorse the panel’s findings.

The panel report also dismissed the retrospective argument that the rules guiding the inquiry were only adopted after the DA had filed its complaint against Mkhwebane. The panel said “there could be little doubt that the new National Assembly rules were meant to apply to conduct which preceded their adoption”.

Dirks, who is among the group in the governing party’s caucus that was objecting to the parliamentary process against Mkhwebane, disagreed with the panel’s views.

Read: Battle to oust Busisiwe Mkhwebane

In a letter on Sunday he also lashed out at ANC chief whip Pemmy Majodina over “inaccuracies” in a media statement released on Saturday, in which Majodina said the party’s caucus had supported the process to hold an inquiry into Mkhwebane.

Dirks said that “the caucus did not agree that the process to impeach the Public Protector should go ahead”. Instead, he said, there were two views expressed in the caucus.

“I therefore find it unfair that you released a statement based on one view that was expressed in caucus.”

He said there were “no extensive discussions in the caucus due to time constraints and many comrades who raised their hands did not get an opportunity, therefore it is not true that the matter was extensively discussed. In fact, towards the end, chaos erupted over the matter and the caucus chair brought the matter abruptly to an end.”

He also said the media statement failed to mention the caucus agreement that Majodina should meet with the ANC top six on Monday [March 15] “to get a mandate from the ANC”.

Read: Discipline others first, says Mbalula

“Comrade, as a loyal member of the ANC and this caucus, I eagerly await the outcomes of the above-mentioned engagements with Luthuli House to give guidance in this respect,” Dirks said.

Majodina had said in a statement on Saturday that the caucus had a lengthy discussion on whether the inquiry against Mkhwebane should be set up, which was not about the merits of the case or how the ANC would vote.

“At this stage, the ANC caucus is very clear. It would be premature to conclude whether there will be voting for retention or against the removal of the Public Protector,” she said.


facebook
twitter
linkedin
instagram

Setumo Stone 

Political Journalist

+27 11 713 9001
Setumo.Stone@citypress.co.za
www.citypress.co.za
69 Kingsway Rd, Auckland Park
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24

E-Editions

Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Tourism Minister Lindiwe Sisulu’s comments on the Constitution and the judiciary has been termed an “extraordinary attack” that is “dangerous and regressive”. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
She’s within her rights
11% - 35 votes
It’s all politics
26% - 84 votes
It was irresponsible
63% - 202 votes
Vote