Bandile Masuku accuses SIU of making baseless findings against him, urges high court to set them aside

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
loading...
Loading, please wait...
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Bandile Masuku. Picture: Gallo Images
Bandile Masuku. Picture: Gallo Images

POLITICS

These were the submissions made by Masuku’s legal representatives, senior counsel William Mokhari and Mbuso Majozi, before a full bench at the Pretoria High Court on Thursday, as Masuku sought to review the findings, have them declared invalid and set aside.

Mokhari had a hard time proving that the reports were final and thus reviewable. He argued that according to the SIU’s responding affidavit, “the two reports were final and recommendations binding, hence could be taken on a legality review, not on promotion of administrative justice review”.

Read this for free
Get 14 days free to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in

E-Editions

Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Two years after André de Ruyter joined Eskom, South Africa is experiencing its worst bout of load shedding. Is he to blame?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
No, he got in late
72% - 86 votes
Yes
6% - 7 votes
Fire the whole lot
22% - 26 votes
Vote