Gift an article

Ramaphosa has nothing to hide, but Acting Public Protector does not want you to see his Phala Phala answers, yet

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
loading...
Loading, please wait...
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Ramaphosa’s answers to the 31 questions were due to be attached to the court record dealing with the legality of Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s suspension. Photo: Archive
Ramaphosa’s answers to the 31 questions were due to be attached to the court record dealing with the legality of Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s suspension. Photo: Archive

NEWS

Ramaphosa’s answers to the 31 questions were due to be attached to the court record dealing with the legality of Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s suspension.

But, his lawyers said over the weekend that Acting Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka’s concerns were making it difficult for them to deliver on their commitment to making the record available to the court.

Read this for free
Get 14 days free to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in

E-Editions

Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Cricket SA is considering replacing Mark Boucher with two coaches, one for red-ball and the other for white-ball responsibilities. Is this a good move?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Love the idea
34% - 55 votes
Hate the idea
34% - 54 votes
They must just be local
32% - 51 votes
Vote