Gift an article

Analysis: Should we even take the Mkhwebane impeachment inquiry seriously?

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
loading...
Loading, please wait...
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane and her legal counsel, advocate Dali Mpofu SC. Photo: Brenton Geach/Gallo Images
Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane and her legal counsel, advocate Dali Mpofu SC. Photo: Brenton Geach/Gallo Images

VOICES

To be honest, the so-called impeachment proceedings – so-called because the legal question on the status of the parliamentary committee is still to be settled – is about the most farcical process since 2015 when an ad hoc committee was formed to investigate the more than R246 million worth of so-called security upgrades at former president Jacob Zuma’s Nkandla homestead in northern KwaZulu-Natal.

Read this for free
Get 14 days free to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in

E-Editions

Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Cricket SA is considering replacing Mark Boucher with two coaches, one for red-ball and the other for white-ball responsibilities. Is this a good move?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Love the idea
34% - 65 votes
Hate the idea
35% - 66 votes
They must just be local
31% - 58 votes
Vote