How SA’s energy sector can maintain investor confidence

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
An electricity pylon.
An electricity pylon.


Electricity is a multilayered challenge for our country. Most obviously, when the lights go out in our homes and businesses, it ranges from annoying to expensive to dangerous.

Politically, power generation is an even more fraught issue, subject to heated debate in government and the making or breaking of political careers.

However, the economics of load shedding go beyond the immediate challenges facing families and businesses.

International credit agencies have put South Africa on notice: 

if current electricity tenders, including the troubled Risk Mitigation Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (RMIPPPP), which adds 2 000MW of power from preferred bidders including Total, Acwa, Karpowership SA and others, does not move forward the country risks another credit downgrade.

As a result of downgrades last year, South Africa has already been removed from the FTSE World Government Bond Index and if we receive the second credit downgrade in two years, it will force the country even further into junk bond status.

South Africa is at a turning point as the world moves into the post-Covid-19 age and electricity is a huge factor. Economic growth will return over the next 12 months, but the continued electricity crisis will constrain that growth.

READ: Residents say: no electricity, no voting

That growth could be negative if our national credit rating is pushed even lower – and the impact on our economy could have long-lasting if not permanent negative effects. Our economy is already on a tightrope with entrepreneurs and new businesses relying on investment and business loans to open their doors.

The lower our credit rating the less likely new and existing businesses are to receive the necessary start-up capital to grow and expand their services. This in turn limits their ability to create new jobs for South Africa, which already has the highest unemployment rate in the world.

There are choices facing the country over whether our current challenge is a one year, five years or a decade or more of trouble. 

We can’t ignore the current drag on the real economy but if we do not push forward with the existing opportunities, we are very likely to cripple future entrepreneurs and job growth for a decade or more.

The current load shedding simply cannot continue.

Part of that is ending the cycle of tender failure which has blighted South Africa. The current subject of debate – the RMIPPPP – should not go the same way as a nuclear tender in the last decade.

The RMIPPPP is far from a complete solution for the country as 2 000MW is a fraction of what is needed, but it is progress in the right direction. It is a partial solution to the immediate load shedding crisis – meaning it is a route to stability upon which South Africa can build. The programme is a foundation for the future that fosters renewable technology in the country.

It is also a symbolic point for the rest of the world and failure again would undermine our political capital among allies and economic capital with the international banks and markets.

READ: SA's economic freedom slumps, exacerbates unemployment crisis

South Africa’s credit rating, already junk bond status of BB- with Fitch Ratings, is held up by a commitment to ease the energy crisis. The latest Fitch update cited affirmed South Africa’s BB- rating but placed us on notice by adding a “negative outlook” for future ratings.

Failure to deliver on all the preferred bidder projects in the RMIPPPP could very well mean a downgrade. A downgrade from BB- takes South Africa from a weak position on the markets to nigh on junk status.

Not only would it be a disaster for our local financial institutions, but it would also hang a sign on the door of our country that we are not “investment grade”. This is not just jargon or a rich-world banking system arbitrarily flexing its muscles, but it has real impact on South Africa’s small and large businesses alike.

Look elsewhere in Africa to see the real impact. Morocco tried to borrow during the Covid-19 crisis to fund its response to the pandemic, but because it’s credit rating was already junk the cost was prohibitive. Other countries didn’t even try to borrow and have been left struggling with a tiny fraction of the public investments spent in the West to resist the pandemic.

South Africa is different to most of its African peers. It’s economy is bigger, richer and more developed. But a collapsing credit rating risks our future. A rising cost of borrowing will drive down the ability of government to invest in the future.

That means crumbling infrastructure, lower growth for years to come and perhaps a return to recession. That will cost jobs, livelihoods – even lives if economic turmoil slips back into public disorder.

We need to build up and out from recent difficulties. Delivering more reliable electricity is the foundation of that and there are no good alternatives.

While the tender, the preferred bidders and the fuel mix have been criticised, it is important to weigh failure to move forward with the consequences. International markets and credit agencies have said clearly, the status quo is no longer on the table: if we don’t secure the current electricity tender and deliver more power, South Africa risks losing so much more than its ability to keep the lights on.

Nxumalo is an energy and general resource exploration expert and co-founder of Magni Investment Holdings and Lurco Group


Delivering the 

news you need

+27 11 713 9001
69 Kingsway Rd, Auckland Park
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24


Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
President Cyril Ramaphosa has praised outgoing Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng for his outstanding leadership and service. Do you agree?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
He served well.
64% - 166 votes
He was too controversial
36% - 95 votes