Nicholas Woode-Smith | Electricity prices should be based on free market principles

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The City of Johannesburg is requesting a load shedding exemption for three days to deal with escalating power outages. Photo: Alfonso Nqunjana/News24
The City of Johannesburg is requesting a load shedding exemption for three days to deal with escalating power outages. Photo: Alfonso Nqunjana/News24
VOICES

As Eskom runs out of diesel to power its backup generators, while the Koeberg Nuclear Power Station goes down for maintenance (on December 8), and South Africans are left in increasingly longer stages of rolling blackouts, the power utility wants to increase electricity prices by 38%.

The National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) is currently considering Eskom’s application to increase electricity prices by 38%. This comes as Eskom struggles to balance its budget. Sales of electricity is down by 14.7% due to the shrinking economy, which Eskom plays a huge part in causing.

READ: Nersa ruling impact: Electricity price decreases not imminent - expert

In response to causing the economy to shrink, Eskom wants to increase prices and further put strain on struggling consumers and businesses; a cold-hearted response devoid of compassion for the poverty-stricken masses and struggling businesses of this country. With inflation high across the board, these price increases may be catastrophic for many.

And, as the economy continues to shrink as a result of Eskom’s incompetence, prices will need to rise even more. A terrible cycle that belies that the problem is not with electricity consumers not buying enough electricity, but with an incompetent state-owned monopoly.

READ: Power is cheap, so we waste it – De Ruyter 

Eskom has always had an irresponsible relationship with electricity prices. Since its founding as Escom, the parastatal was discouraged from charging for a profit when selling electricity. This seemed fine much of the 20th century. Cheap coal and apartheid-enforced cheap labour kept prices low. But even with the government subsidising unsustainably low electricity prices, it should have been clear that Eskom couldn’t keep this up forever. But it tried. 

In the 90s, Eskom even bragged that it was producing the cheapest electricity in the world. Not because of good governance or intelligence, but purely because it was funded by debt.

While it continued to decrease electricity prices and expand electrification to more and more people, it couldn’t afford to build more power plants.

It is only recently that Eskom began to raise its prices to try cover to its past and future costs. But, it is far too late to make up for the shortfall caused by the hubristic desire to produce dirt cheap electricity. Without the ability to charge for a profit, Eskom became an unsustainable and doomed entity that couldn’t prepare for the future. 

Undercharging led to Eskom being unable to build new generating capacity. Political interference only exacerbated the problems by introducing increasingly corrupt elements and disincentivising efficiency.

READ: Consumers may soon have to dig deeper into their pockets for power 

Eskom’s fundamental problem is that it is a state-owned monopoly. It does not have a competitor to force it to embrace sound behaviour.

It can undercharge for electricity because it can keep on getting bailouts from the government. It can overcharge because it has no competitor for consumers to replace it with.

All the while politicians use it for corrupt gains and petty agendas.

This creates a perfect storm for an irresponsible entity that is, sadly, essential to the running of the economy and the prosperity of the country. 

Perhaps, this 38% price increase is prudent. Low prices caused a lot of Eskom’s problems in the past. But we have no real way of knowing if this is a correct course of action because Eskom has no competitor to hold it accountable.

This is why electricity needs to be privatised. Without many enterprises competing to produce and sell electricity, prices are just thumb sucked and arbitrary values imposed on consumers by a monopoly that can’t even keep the lights on.

If we privatise electricity, then prices may rise or fall, but it would be a genuine price determined by supply and demand. Not the dictates of the corrupt and incompetent.
  

Even without privatisation, however, Eskom could already do a lot to cut unnecessary costs and spare South Africans an exorbitant price hike that we can scarcely afford.

Sixty-six percent of Eskom staff are redundant and could be retrenched. This could save the parastatal, consumers, and taxpayers an exorbitant amount. Solving procurement corruption and punishing the staff who purchased mops for over R200 000 would also go a long way to cut costs. That is not to mention sorting out all the corruption and theft surrounding diesel and coal.

READ: The next stage of Eskom's attack: Reducing cross subsidisation of electricity 

Eskom needs to clean house before it demands more money from consumers. Once it eliminates its overstaffing issues, corruption, and cuts spending as much as possible, then it will have a bit more of a right to raise prices.

But even then, it won’t truly hold that right. So long as Eskom holds monopoly power and can impose its terrible service and rising prices on South Africans, it holds no real right to demand more from us. The only solution is privatisation. Let a thousand power producers compete. Only then will the price be realistic and economically sound.

Nicholas Woode-Smith, an author, economic historian and political analyst, is a contributing author for the Free Market Foundation.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Latest issue
Latest issue
All the news from City Press in PDF form.
Read now
Voting Booth
Damaged traffic lights and load shedding have led to a mushrooming of informal traffic controllers – mostly homeless people or beggars – in Joburg's major intersections. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
We need them
20% - 14 votes
Deploy professionals
39% - 28 votes
They pose more disorder
25% - 18 votes
They must be paid
15% - 11 votes
Vote