for subscribers

Frans Cronje: Stepping towards a ‘Nanny State’? Why sugar tax should be avoided.

Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!

Many equate a sugar tax to a strict form of nannying. And in South Africa’s case it’s a plan to cut down on levels of obesity. But there’s no historical correlation to prove that adoptng a sugar tax will reduce obesity levels – people will find their sugar elsewhere.

So what is government’s real objective here? Frans Cronje, CEO of the Institute of Race Relations applies his mind to the debate. He’s concerned that South Africans have fought so hard to re-assert their freedom from an overbearing state, but such a tax is forcing them to let go of those rights once again. A good read. – Stuart Lowman

By Frans Cronje*

There’s more to this story
Subscribe to News24 and get access to our exclusive journalism and features today.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
ZAR/USD
16.58
(+0.82)
ZAR/GBP
21.38
(+1.01)
ZAR/EUR
19.49
(+0.59)
ZAR/AUD
11.92
(+0.51)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.87)
Gold
1904.95
(+0.92)
Silver
23.74
(+1.72)
Platinum
897.00
(+0.75)
Brent Crude
42.12
(+1.78)
Palladium
2310.00
(+0.76)
All Share
54446.78
(+0.34)
Top 40
50159.14
(+0.23)
Financial 15
10158.72
(+0.86)
Industrial 25
73766.43
(+0.79)
Resource 10
53032.08
(-0.66)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1404 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 9100 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 2002 votes
Vote