Supplementary Budget 2020

What #Budget2017 could mean for low and middle income earners

Cape Town - Standard Bank SA economist Siphamandla Mkhwanazi explains how Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan's budget speech could impact low and middle income earners.

Bracket creep to disproportionately affect middle income earners

Last year’s Medium Term Budget stipulated that tax increases were needed to ensure that government revenue rise by an additional R28bn for the 2017/18 tax year and a further R15bn in 2018/19.

"Given low economic growth, the minister will face tough choices. However, the recent rally in commodity prices, and our forecast that GDP growth may accelerate to 1.4% this year if commodity prices remain near current levels, will allow Treasury more room to manoeuvre and buy SA more time before a VAT increase is required."

VAT hike has a disproportionate effect on low income earners

A VAT hike means a rise in the living costs (or a decline in buying power) of consumers across the economy, but the effect is disproportionately higher for lower income households, Mkhwanazi said.

Household expenditure data from the BMR shows that that those households earning below R89 000 per annum spend  between 36% and 42% of their income on food and beverages.

PIT weigh more on middle income earners

Mkhwanazi said GDP growth over the next three years is expected to remain structurally below potential, and is unlikely to create adequate new employment to broaden the tax base.

SBR’s forecast is for 108 000 net job losses in 2017. Growth in personal income tax revenue can only really be achieved by higher taxes and/or bracket creep. Bracket creep will affect the middle income consumer disproportionately, i.e. those earning R89 000 – R202 500, R202 500 – R412 000, and R412 000 – R707 000.

"This is because the middle segment relies more on salaries and wages as a primary source of income, compared to low and affluent income groups," he said.

Data from BMR shows that about 85% of households in the middle segment rely on salaries and wages as their primary source of income, compared to 48% in the low income group and 75% in the affluent earning group.

"In addition, this segment encapsulates major civil servant professions such as teachers, nurses, social workers. Given that government, the country’s largest employer, is currently scaling down on its wage bill, the purchasing power of this group is at risk," he said.

"Furthermore, debt levels are higher among the middle segments than for low and affluent earners. The middle segment comprises 32.3% of the population, and contributes 62% to total expenditure."

Corporate tax revenue (CIT) tax take to benefit from higher commodity prices

Due to the economic slowdown and specifically to the fall in commodity prices, CIT’s contribution to total tax revenue has been falling in recent years (from 21% in 2011/12 to 18% in 2015/16).

"An increase in the corporate tax rate is seen as potentially counterproductive since South Africa is believed to have reached the threshold above which additional corporate tax increases are likely to have a negative effect on revenue collected."

However, Mkhwanazi added that the recent commodity price rally has boosted earnings of major tax-contributing corporates in the mining sector, resulting in better than expected corporate tax collections in recent months.

"Whereas in 2013/14 the mining and quarrying contributed 9% of CIT, or 15bn, as commodity prices plummeted the sector’s contribution fell to 3% of CIT or R3.2bn in 2015/16. We expect current commodity prices to remain near current levels in 2017 and that this should have a positive effect on CIT revenue in the 2017/18 and 2018/19 fiscal years."

Income gap narrowing, although still elevated

South Africa continues to have one of the highest levels of inequality in the world. However, from BMR data it appears that government’s fiscal policy, which redistributes wealth and income via social grants as well as an increase in public sector employment via the expanded public works and other programmes, has made some progress with respect to reducing income inequality, said the bank.

Currently, over 17 million South Africans receive social grants, and about 24% of households rely on grants as their primary source of income.

"We estimate that the ratio of average income in the lowest income group (R0-R20 500 p.a.) to average income in the highest income group (R2 414 001+ p.a.) declined by about 43%, from 1:8086 in 2011 to 1:4578 in 2016.

"That is, in 2011, on average for every R1 earned by an individual in the lowest income group, an individual in the wealthy income group earned R8 086. In 2016, we estimate this to have moderated to R4 578 for every R1," said Mkhwanazi.

* Visit our Budget Special for all the budget news and in-depth analysis.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
I'm not really directly affected
18% - 1955 votes
I am taking a hit, but should be able to recover in the next year
23% - 2553 votes
My finances have been devastated
34% - 3809 votes
It's still too early to know what the full effect will be
25% - 2736 votes