Supplementary Budget 2020

Gordhan's 2017 Budget disappoints on many levels - CEO

Cape Town - Although Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan’s 2017 Budget was the best that could be done under extremely challenging circumstances, it is difficult not be disappointed with the national economic trajectory, said Ryan Ravens, CEO of Accelerate Cape Town, a business leader organisation. 

“With the creation of a new marginal tax rate of 45% for individuals earning above R1.5m per annum, we are rapidly reaching the ceiling with respect to how much more can be squeezed from individual taxpayers. 

Taxes not used to redress inequality

“The long-term sustainable solution for South Africa is clearly not to keep increasing the tax burden on this minority of top earners,” Ravens said. 

“With the current levels of inequality in South Africa, a wealth tax would seem fair and appropriate if government could be trusted to use the extra money wisely, however we have seen in recent years that these additional proceeds are not being used to redress inequality, but are instead captured to feather the nests of corrupt politicians.”

READ: Don't rely too much on personal income tax, warns commission

He cites the recent swearing in of former Eskom CEO Brian Molefe as an MP as an illustration of the “complete lack of accountability” and as an example of no consequences for people who are implicated in corruption.
Minister Gordhan has found additional sources of revenue through the taxation of sugary beverages, sin taxes and fuel levies, but this is simply not enough to cover budgeted expenditure. 

“Although the budget deficit will grow at a slower rate, it is still growing and that is becoming increasingly problematic. We desperately need to grow the tax base by creating more jobs and more small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

“The growth that South Africa needs is most likely to come from SMEs, but we need to start doing more to support this segment of the economy. Government procurement is one obvious area that could have a significant impact and so is corporate procurement through Enterprise and Supplier Development programmes.”

What about the National Development Plan (NDP)?
The most significant omission from the current political narrative and budget, Ravens argues, is a focus on the National Development Plan. 

“This is an economic strategy hailed by most as the way toward prosperity and inclusive economic growth. It is a robust and well-conceived strategy, but remains no more than that until a serious effort is made to implement it. Instead we now hear populist talk of ‘radical economic transformation’ with very little substance or indication as to what that means and how it will be achieved.”

READ: Economic transformation more than just a slogan - Gordhan 

According to Ravens, government will also need to seriously consider how it will decrease its own wage bill. 

South Africa has the odious distinction of being the top country in the world with respect to the percentage of GDP that it spends on itself. Given the size of our economy, we are simply paying too much for government wages. This statistic is even more concerning when one considers the poor levels of service delivery and competence of our highest-ranking public officials.

'Stop the leakage'  

“If we are serious about turning our economy around, we need to get serious about stopping the leakage from our national fiscus. Increasing the tax burden on our tiny tax base makes absolutely no difference when the proceeds from those increased taxes are lost through corruption, and wasteful expenditure.”

He adds that he budget also disappointed in that it did not address measures to improve the skills of public servants to drive greater efficiency, nor did it speak to how government intends to weed out corruption. The additional revenues accrued from a wealth tax pales in comparison to the amount of money being squandered every year.

READ: Irregular govt spend balloons to over R46bn  

“South Africa has enormous potential and many of our challenges are not unique within the global context. We are a relatively small contributor to the global economy and are more affected by external forces than anything that transpires in parliament. 

“However, if we are to poke our heads above the herd of emerging economies as an exceptionally attractive value proposition, we need to get our people to work and the engine of our economy churning, and this won’t be achieved by taxing 103 000 top-earning individuals 4% more,” he concluded.

Check out Fin24's tax calculators:

This is how much more you'll cough up for your sins

Have a look at your income tax burden

* Visit our Budget Special for all the budget news and in-depth analysis.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 830 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 5483 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
15% - 1096 votes