Airbnb ends forced arbitration for discrimination and harassment

Airbnb, following Google, Facebook and Uber, said it would not force employees who filed sexual harassment claims to settle those cases in private arbitration.

Airbnb also said it would not require employees to use arbitration in cases involving discrimination, which includes racial, gender, religious and age inequity.

That policy differs from some other companies which have rolled back forced arbitration rules, but only for sexual harassment cases. Nick Papas, an Airbnb spokesperson, said that Airbnb is the first major technology company to remove binding arbitration for discrimination cases as well.

The news comes on the heels of last week’s announcements from Google and Facebook that the companies had changed some policies around sexual harassment, including making arbitration optional in claims.

Google had been under pressure to change its rules following an employee walkout on November 1 in protest of the tech giant’s handling of sexual misconduct by its executives.

In May, Uber also said it would no longer require arbitration for sexual harassment and assault claims.

Although Airbnb employees may now sue in court, the company will continue to require its guests and hosts to settle sexual and discrimination claims through arbitration. In 2016, Airbnb successfully prevented a class action lawsuit after the home-sharing company was accused of allowing its hosts to reject guests based on their race.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

ZAR/USD
17.63
(-0.14)
ZAR/GBP
23.01
(-0.05)
ZAR/EUR
20.78
(-0.04)
ZAR/AUD
12.62
(-0.03)
ZAR/JPY
0.17
(-0.02)
Gold
2034.21
(+0.05)
Silver
28.28
(+0.09)
Platinum
961.50
(+0.38)
Brent Crude
44.55
(-1.53)
Palladium
2166.01
(+0.63)
All Share
56757.73
(-1.56)
Top 40
52435.65
(-1.72)
Financial 15
9897.96
(+0.10)
Industrial 25
74671.49
(-1.98)
Resource 10
58948.78
(-1.89)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 929 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 6241 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
15% - 1284 votes
Vote