AYO, Survé hit back: Nothing untoward about 'informal' PIC discussion

accreditation
Dr Iqbal Survé. (Picture: City Press)
Dr Iqbal Survé. (Picture: City Press)

A secret recording, revealing that businessman Dr Iqbal Survé colluded with board members of Ayo Technologies to secure an investment from the Public Investment Corporation, was nothing more than an "informal discussion" and those implicated have nothing to hide.

This is according to a joint statement from the boards of African Equity Empowerment Investment (AEEI), Ayo Technologies, Sekunjalo Investment Holdings and Survé, issued on Monday afternoon.

The Sunday Times reported at the weekend that Survé and some Ayo board members had discussed withholding information from the PIC, which eventually led to the PIC making a R4.3bn investment in the IT company.

The PIC manages R2trn worth of investments, with the Government Employee Pension Fund as its biggest client.

'Unfair treatment'

"There is not a single lie that has been told to the PIC, as has been suggested in the press report, and the Sekunjalo Group, AEEI, AYO and Dr Survé continue to feel aggrieved by this unfair treatment in the public domain," the statement read.

The recording was made by one of the former AYO executives, and was made without permission by participants, the statement added.

"Having said that, the meeting was an informal discussion between senior executives in charge of the various parties to this statement and despite the recording having been made without their permission, the participants have nothing to hide based on the contents of what was said during this confidential meeting."

The discussion relates to a transaction that would see AYO acquire AEEI's 30% stake in BT South Africa. However, the transaction was not successful and executives got together to discuss the next steps, the statement indicated.

"This is not unusual in any business situation. The parties got together to sift fact from fiction, face to face."

"The contents of the recorded meeting clearly show that it was nothing but an attempt by the executives of AEEI and AYO to get together in pursuit of a transaction they were tying to secure and to jointly exercise and fulfil their fiduciary duties to ensure the protection of their respective companies shareholders and other stakeholders."

According to the statement, the former executives who were present at the meeting did not agree on a proposed strategy as a way forward and subsequently resigned.

The statement concluded by saying the former executives had been attempting to secure an "unreasonable payout" from AYO, which was unsuccessful.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.75
+0.4%
Rand - Pound
20.27
-0.5%
Rand - Euro
17.32
+0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.77
-0.4%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.7%
Gold
1,751.17
-1.0%
Silver
22.71
+0.1%
Palladium
1,981.41
-2.4%
Platinum
1,002.50
+0.1%
Brent Crude
76.19
+2.5%
Top 40
57,643
+1.2%
All Share
64,049
+1.1%
Resource 10
57,254
+0.5%
Industrial 25
82,879
+1.7%
Financial 15
14,317
+1.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
What potential restrictions on unvaccinated South Africans may make the biggest difference to public health, the economy?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Limited access to restaurants and bars
11% - 127 votes
Limited access to shopping centres
14% - 165 votes
Limited access to live events, including sport matches and festivals
26% - 301 votes
Workplace vaccine mandates
48% - 552 votes
Vote