SANEF calls for mediation in SABC debacle as unions stand firm

The SABC describes the current financial crisis as 'the most critical for the future and sustainability of this 84-year-old institution'.
The SABC describes the current financial crisis as 'the most critical for the future and sustainability of this 84-year-old institution'.
  • The South African Broadcasting Corporation board announced it would suspend the section 189 retrenchment consultations for seven days.
  • The South African National Editors Forum said there was not sufficient consultation on the proposed structure, which indicated gaps in the structure presented.
  • Unions have indicated that they plan to continue with their strike actions and litigation against the layoff consultation plans.



The South African National Editors Forum has urged the South African Broadcasting Corporation and management of its newsrooms to mediate their way out of the financial storm brought about by the broadcaster’s now-suspended plans to start retrenchment consultations.

After a marathon meeting on Thursday, the SABC board announced through a statement at midnight that it would suspend the section 189 retrenchment consultation processes for seven days while the public service broadcaster assessed its options.

The Broadcast, Electronic, Media and Allied Workers Union announced that it would approach the courts in a bid to interdict the SABC from proceeding with retrenchment consultations while the Communication Workers Union threatened strike action that could lead to a blackout on broadcast platforms.

The SANEF statement said there was not sufficient consultation on the proposed structure, syaing there were gaps in the structure presented that could impede operations directly linked to delivering on its public service responsibilities.

"SANEF has proposed a mediated process to both management and editors to try and resolve the impasse, as the instability in the news division at the public broadcaster threatens its ability to deliver on its expansive, but sadly unfunded public mandate," said the SANEF statement.

Bloated, top-heavy

The SANEF statement conceded that the wage bill and structure of the SABC, as it currently stood, was unsustainable and needed to be addressed.

"A bloated, top-heavy structure is the unfortunate consequence of years of mismanagement, including the payment of above-inflation and irregular increases and bonuses. All parties agree that for the SABC to be saved, costs must be cut," the statement said.

Meanwhile, CWU spokesperson Aubrey Tshabalala told Fin24 on Friday morning that the decision by the SABC to suspend retrenchment consultations for a week did nothing to stop their strike plans.

"In so far as we are concerned, SABC has not formally spoken to us, nor did they respond to our demands which are very clear. We want the withdrawal of the dismissal letters. We want management to abandon the section 189 process," said Tshabalala.

Tshabalala said the CWU planned program of strike action would resume as planned from Friday. While Bemawu could not be reached immediately for comment, they have given no indication of an intention to retreat from their interdict bid.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
ZAR/USD
15.32
(-0.54)
ZAR/GBP
20.47
(-0.11)
ZAR/EUR
18.54
(-0.80)
ZAR/AUD
11.35
(-0.89)
ZAR/JPY
0.15
(-0.35)
Gold
1828.90
(+1.04)
Silver
24.02
(+0.94)
Platinum
1009.00
(+1.66)
Brent Crude
47.23
(-0.96)
Palladium
2398.00
(+0.10)
All Share
58281.98
(+1.34)
Top 40
53482.74
(+1.36)
Financial 15
11306.98
(+0.61)
Industrial 25
79065.38
(-0.00)
Resource 10
55472.68
(+3.57)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, and I've gotten it.
21% - 371 votes
No, I did not.
51% - 903 votes
My landlord refused
28% - 484 votes
Vote