'We can't just throw SAA away' - Ramaphosa

Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing the closing session of the Indigenous and Traditional Leaders Indaba. (Supplied, GCIS)
Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing the closing session of the Indigenous and Traditional Leaders Indaba. (Supplied, GCIS)

Cape Town – South Africans who argue bailing out cash-strapped national carrier South African Airways (SAA) amounts to throwing good money after bad don’t realise what they’re talking about, Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa said on Wednesday.

Responding to questions in the National Council of Provinces, Ramaphosa said that had government folded its arms and done nothing when SAA ran the risk of defaulting on its debt, the consequences would have been catastrophic for the entire economy.

“South Africa Inc. would have been at great risk. Government is the guarantor of last resort. Had we done nothing, we would have been required to pay up in one go. An SAA default on debt would have run across all other guarantees to state-owned enterprises such as those to Transnet and Eskom,” he said.

READ: Parliament to get legal opinion on legality of SAA bailout 

This in turn would have had an impact on government bonds and South Africa’s sovereign credit rating, Ramaphosa said. “We need to take this (bailout) on the cheek and hope the new board and CEO (of SAA) can turn the national carrier around.”

SAA has received two emergency bailouts in 2017 to prevent it from defaulting on its debt.

Standard Chartered insisted that a R2.2bn loan be settled in full at the end of June, while Citibank demanded the repayment of its R1.8bn loan on September 29.

In both instances, Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba invoked section 16 of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) to grant the cash-strapped carrier a lifeline.


Ramaphosa said that, in addition to the R1.8bn already paid out to Citibank, another R5bn in loans is owed to other lenders who have agreed to extend these on condition that SAA receive a capital injection of R3bn.

“Therefore the Finance Minister allocated a R10bn equity injection to SAA in his medium term budget policy statement, which includes the R2.2bn provided in June this year and R3bn in September this year,” he said. 

READ: SAA bailout will blow lid off government's expenditure ceiling if Gigaba's plan fails 

Government believes that the reconstituted SAA board and its new CEO will put the national airline on a path to financial sustainability, the Deputy President added. 

Vuyani Jarana, formerly chief officer at Vodacom Business, started as new CEO of SAA on Wednesday. 

SAA's new board, meanwhile, was announced on October 19 after Cabinet had approved the appointment of six new board members, including a new chairperson to replace embattled Dudu Myeni.

Myeni was replaced by businessman Johannes Bhekumuzi "JB" Magwaza as chairperson.

Nolitha Fakude was named the new deputy chairperson and non-executive director, replacing Tryphosa Ramano.

READ: Gigaba was forced to change SAA board - economist 

“There are challenges that SAA has had to face. But the pleasing thing is that remedial actions are now underway,” Ramaphosa said. 

He appealed to members of the NCOP, in particular the DA, to give SAA's new management an opportunity to execute their plan of action.

“Let’s not beat SAA to the ground. They’re South Africans who have been given a very difficult task. As they set off rather than tear them down, say to them ‘We wish you the very best.’

“We can’t just throw SAA away. It’s a prized asset with a far reach globally and domestically,” Ramaphosa said. 

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATE: Get Fin24's top morning business news and opinions in your inbox.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1303 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 8631 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1901 votes