for subscribers

5 reasons why Eskom is wrong about renewables costs – CSIR

Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!

Cape Town – The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has refuted Eskom’s cost calculations regarding renewable energy, after the utility said surplus power caused a net loss of R9bn to the economy.

The debate comes as a battle of energy ideas rages amid the Department of Energy’s (DoE's) public consultation process for its draft Integrated Energy Plan and the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). This week the DoE extended the consultation process to March 31 2017.

The final outcome will determine the energy mix government and Eskom will aim for. Eskom is a strong proponent of increasing nuclear energy power stations, as it believes renewables are intermittent and expensive and coal is a big carbon emitter. Renewable energy advocates, such as the CSIR, say the latest data proves Eskom is wrong.

There’s more to this story
Subscribe to News24 and get access to our exclusive journalism and features today.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
ZAR/USD
16.29
(+0.22)
ZAR/GBP
21.04
(+0.13)
ZAR/EUR
19.12
(+0.50)
ZAR/AUD
11.77
(+0.58)
ZAR/JPY
0.15
(+0.51)
Gold
1949.59
(+0.02)
Silver
26.76
(+0.16)
Platinum
928.80
(+0.44)
Brent Crude
43.52
(-0.32)
Palladium
2356.01
(+0.63)
All Share
54673.65
(-0.66)
Top 40
50399.16
(-0.59)
Financial 15
9841.32
(-2.14)
Industrial 25
72558.00
(-1.08)
Resource 10
55438.10
(+0.58)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1306 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 8640 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1904 votes
Vote