5 reasons why Eskom is wrong about renewables costs – CSIR

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!

Cape Town – The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has refuted Eskom’s cost calculations regarding renewable energy, after the utility said surplus power caused a net loss of R9bn to the economy.

The debate comes as a battle of energy ideas rages amid the Department of Energy’s (DoE's) public consultation process for its draft Integrated Energy Plan and the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). This week the DoE extended the consultation process to March 31 2017.

The final outcome will determine the energy mix government and Eskom will aim for. Eskom is a strong proponent of increasing nuclear energy power stations, as it believes renewables are intermittent and expensive and coal is a big carbon emitter. Renewable energy advocates, such as the CSIR, say the latest data proves Eskom is wrong.

Support independent journalism
Subscribe to News24 for just R75 per month to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. You can cancel any time.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Rand - Dollar
15.96
-0.4%
Rand - Pound
21.23
-0.5%
Rand - Euro
18.06
-0.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.38
-0.5%
Rand - Yen
0.14
-0.7%
Gold
1,783.03
+0.5%
Silver
22.45
-1.7%
Palladium
1,753.19
+0.6%
Platinum
947.91
+0.8%
Brent Crude
69.23
-5.5%
Top 40
64,786
+1.1%
All Share
71,198
+1.0%
Resource 10
67,859
+0.9%
Industrial 25
93,997
+0.9%
Financial 15
13,880
+2.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot