Brown refutes Eskom privatisation plans

accreditation
Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown. (Photo: Matthew le Cordeur)
Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown. (Photo: Matthew le Cordeur)

Cape Town – Minister of Public Enterprises Lynne Brown ruled out the privatisation of basic services - such as the provision of electricity and water - and said load shedding will continue for three more years.

Until the “end-state” of Eskom is clarified “we can't say what parts should go where”, said Brown, who was speaking at a media briefing ahead of her budget vote in the National Assembly on Thursday afternoon.

Reuters reported on Wednesday that South Africa was considering either partially privatising Eskom or putting up some of its assets for sale in order to secure funding for the power producer and resolve an energy crisis.

However, Brown was emphatic that she did not believe one should change the state-driven ownership model “for now... until you know what you are working towards. You can't make a decision (about) what happens to Eskom or any of the other state owned companies (until then)".

Brown told reporters that South Africa can expect three more years of power cuts, Reuters reported.

My long politician's answer

Turning to what she called "my long politician's answer", namely the question of what could be privatised by the State, Brown said: "Basic services must be provided by the State. How private companies and the private sector interact with that is part of what we are trying to do now. (But) we must be able to remain in charge as a State for want of a better word".

Turning to the troubled Eskom, Brown said that even "in the deepest difficult time" - apparently referring to load shedding - Eskom had been able to connect 160 000 households with electricity.

"It (Eskom) can’t be driven by capital... or profit," she said, noting that it was the State's responsibility - through Eskom as a commercial venture - to carry out the developmental responsibility.

She said that when SAA had fallen under her protection, she had proposed that a "strategic equity partner" should be brought in. She continued to hold this view.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.59
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
20.30
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
17.34
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.73
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,814.19
0.0%
Silver
25.49
0.0%
Palladium
2,662.50
0.0%
Platinum
1,051.86
0.0%
Brent Crude
75.41
+0.4%
Top 40
62,852
-0.9%
All Share
68,971
-0.9%
Resource 10
70,683
-2.0%
Industrial 25
88,051
-0.4%
Financial 15
12,906
+0.6%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1490 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2305 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3646 votes
Vote