Brian Molefe petitions Supreme Court over pension payout

Brian Molefe: Resigned, retired, retrenched, retained...? (Pic: Gallo Images)
Brian Molefe: Resigned, retired, retrenched, retained...? (Pic: Gallo Images)

Johannesburg – Former Eskom CEO Brian Molefe has petitioned the Supreme Court to appeal against the high court decision which ruled that he must pay back part of the R30m pension he received from the firm.

Molefe is making an application for leave to appeal the whole judgment of the North Gauteng High Court set down in April. 

In papers seen by Fin24, Molefe says the court “erred in its finding that the early retirement agreement was a deliberate scheme devised by Eskom with my involvement to afford me pension benefits to which I was not entitled”.

He maintains that the agreement was concluded on the basis of a “common (mis) understanding” by him, Eskom and the Eskom Pension and Provident Fund (PPF) rules.

He also argues that his departure from the power utility “was not a resignation, but was a (purported) consensual early retirement” which was subsequently found to be contrary to the Eskom PPF rules. 

In April, the North Gauteng High Court dismissed Molefe’s application for leave to appeal, saying there was no prospect that another court would come to a different conclusion.

He was required to pay about R11m of the R30m he received from Eskom following his early departure in November 2016.

Molefe resigned after his name was implicated in a damning Public Protector report on state capture.

According to a copy of the papers filed on Tuesday, Molefe claims that he never received a sum of R30m as widely reported, but instead got a cash portion of the pension benefits which amounted to R7.7m.

He says the benefit was “erroneously” afforded to him.

He appeals that the State of Capture report published by former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela in November 2016 “contained unfounded observations about me”.

Trade union Solidarity, which brought the court challenge against Molefe together with the Democratic Alliance, said it has already instructed its legal team to oppose the petition.

“We are extremely disappointed in Mr Molefe’s decision to petition the court. He unlawfully received taxayers’ money. With this decision he once again failed a character test,” said Solidarity chief executive Dirk Hermann.

* SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATE: Get Fin24's top morning business news and opinions in your inbox.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
ZAR/USD
15.20
(-0.25)
ZAR/GBP
20.40
(-0.01)
ZAR/EUR
18.42
(-0.06)
ZAR/AUD
11.29
(-0.13)
ZAR/JPY
0.15
(+0.06)
Gold
1835.48
(-0.24)
Silver
24.14
(+0.55)
Platinum
1061.00
(+3.78)
Brent Crude
48.78
(+0.95)
Palladium
2336.01
(+1.71)
All Share
59419.37
(+0.80)
Top 40
54500.04
(+0.61)
Financial 15
11646.83
(+2.17)
Industrial 25
79758.36
(+0.10)
Resource 10
57015.33
(+0.70)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, and I've gotten it.
21% - 384 votes
No, I did not.
52% - 948 votes
My landlord refused
27% - 499 votes
Vote