Office of Chief Justice denies Guptas influenced Molefe case date

Ajay Gupta believes the idea of state capture is an imaginary concept created by the media.
Ajay Gupta believes the idea of state capture is an imaginary concept created by the media.

Cape Town - The Office of the Chief Justice on Friday said that Ajay Gupta did not approach the Gauteng Deputy Judge President to influence the starting date of the upcoming court proceedings of former Eskom CEO Brian Molefe.

On Wednesday, suspended Eskom legal head Suzanne Daniels testified before a parliamentary inquiry that Ajay Gupta told her in July 2017 that he would move the date of Molefe's hearing to another date.

Daniels said she met the Gupta brother at an apartment near Melrose Arch in Johannesburg on July 29.

"The purpose of the discussion was around the process of the Molefe court proceedings. Mr Gupta wanted to know how far they were," Daniels told the inquiry.

She said that Ajay told her that he would speak to "someone" at the Gauteng Deputy Judge President’s office to have the hearing take place after December 2017.

Daniels said that Duduzane Zuma, Deputy Minister [of Public Enterprises] Ben Martins, a Chinese lady "whose name I could not remember" and Gupta business associate, Salim Essa, were also present at the meeting.

READ: Eskom inquiry hears evidence that the Guptas took care of Molefe and Koko

In a statement on Friday, the Office of the Chief Justice said it "unequivocally refuted" the "misleading" statement attributed to Ajay Gupta.

"In fact, that statement was allegedly made in July 2017, when pleadings had not yet been lodged."

"We can also confirm that the officials in the office of the Deputy Judge President have informed the Deputy Judge President that there has been no approach to them by anyone to have the date changed," the statement read.

"As the Office of the Chief Justice, we are not aware of any inappropriate conduct by any court officials relating to the enrolment of this and other matters and thus encourages any member of the public who may have information regarding any wrongful activity in this regard to approach the Office of the Chief Justice with such information."

Daniels, meanwhile, on Thursday tweeted that she stood by her testimony at the inquiry.

"By virtue of being a lawyer, I am an officer of the court and to top it up, I also took an oath in Parliament ahead of proffering my evidence. I, therefore, would not have lied to Parliament and risk various applicable consequences. I stand by my testimony."

The Molefe case is set to start on November 29.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATE: Get Fin24's top morning business news and opinions in your inbox.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

ZAR/USD
16.83
(+0.40)
ZAR/GBP
21.28
(+0.33)
ZAR/EUR
19.06
(+0.68)
ZAR/AUD
11.75
(+0.65)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.62)
Gold
1807.58
(-0.02)
Silver
18.81
(+0.79)
Platinum
849.00
(+0.24)
Brent Crude
43.32
(+0.49)
Palladium
1945.43
(+2.33)
All Share
56432.04
(+1.00)
Top 40
52106.93
(+1.06)
Financial 15
10338.57
(+0.62)
Industrial 25
78261.80
(+0.98)
Resource 10
53447.93
(+1.24)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'm not really directly affected
18% - 1851 votes
I am taking a hit, but should be able to recover in the next year
23% - 2418 votes
My finances have been devastated
34% - 3599 votes
It's still too early to know what the full effect will be
25% - 2589 votes
Vote