No fair hearing for Numsa, says Jim

accreditation
Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim. (File photo)
Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim. (File photo)

Johannesburg - The National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa) is adamant it will not be given a fair hearing in Friday's Cosatu central executive committee (CEC) meeting, where the union's future in the federation will be discussed.

"[Numsa] has already been found guilty without being afforded the opportunity to present our case and we have raised that," Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim said outside the High Court in Johannesburg on Thursday.

"We have no reason to believe that Numsa will be given a fair hearing in the CEC."

A Numsa application for an urgent court interdict stopping the CEC meeting, which was expected to expel the metalworkers' union, was postponed by the court on Thursday.

Judge Brian Mashile ordered that the matter be enrolled and postponed sine die (at a date to be arranged). An order on costs was reserved.

This meant the Congress of SA Trade Unions' central executive committee meeting would go ahead on Friday.

READ this week's Labour Wrap Cosatu is in a mess and add your voice to the labour debate:

Jim, his deputy Karl Cloete, Numsa president Andrew Chirwa, and Cosatu president Sidumo Dlamini were in court on Thursday.

Standing on the steps of the high court, Dlamini said he was happy with the court order.

"The CEC tomorrow is going ahead, where matters will be discussed. Everybody, including Numsa, will be given an opportunity to state any concern they have," he said.

Numsa would be given an opportunity to explain to the CEC why it should not be expelled or suspended after being accused of violating Cosatu's constitution.

Dlamini would not comment on the charges against Numsa.

"We are not casting disciplinary processes here, we are having a central executive committee meeting that must be tasked with matters, among those, the extension of the scope by Numsa."

Numsa was facing five charges. One relates to Numsa's decision to extend its scope of operation to other sectors after being accused of poaching members from other Cosatu affiliates.

Jim said many other affiliates had taken the same decision before, yet were not taken to task.

"Many other affiliates have taken the same decision."

Jim said Numsa would address this during its presentation to the CEC.

Numsa faces charges relating to a decision it took at its special national congress in December not to support the African National Congress during the general elections in May, and over its call that Cosatu withdraw from the alliance with the ruling party.

Jim questioned whether this was a legitimate reason to expel Numsa or suspend it, again saying other unions had taken similar decisions in the past.

"We will not take workers' money to spend on the ANC that is driving a right-wing neo-liberal agenda. Indeed we will give them [the CEC] a run down of the neo-liberal agenda that's been running for the last 20 years."

Two of the five charges - Numsa's decision to organise a march to Cosatu and its decision to hold back on paying affiliation fees - had no standing because Numsa had not followed through with them, Jim said.

He said the union was an affiliate in good standing.

The final charge was based on Numsa's decision to not pay a levy to a political fund meant to benefit the SA Communist Party.

Jim said Numsa would attend Friday's CEC and defend itself against all the charges.

"We will be in the Cosatu CEC to workshop the CEC on how important are the five resolutions that Numsa has taken and why there is no basis why Numsa should be dismissed," he said.

"For now we will go and do a proper presentation to them in the Cosatu CEC and they must take a decision. On the basis of that we might have to come back to this court."

ALSO READ:

- Numsa expulsion: Cosatu meeting to go ahead
- Numsa breaks away from ANC alliance
- Cosatu adjouns special meeting
- Labour Wrap: Clarifying Cosatu confusion

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
15.12
-1.1%
Rand - Pound
20.46
+0.2%
Rand - Euro
17.66
-1.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.94
-0.3%
Rand - Yen
0.14
-0.7%
Gold
1,737.57
-0.7%
Silver
22.47
-0.7%
Palladium
1,871.50
-4.9%
Platinum
968.00
-1.6%
Brent-ruolie
79.53
+1.8%
Top 40
57,462
-0.6%
All Share
63,784
-0.6%
Resource 10
56,880
-1.5%
Industrial 25
82,305
-0.7%
Financial 15
14,437
+1.3%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
What potential restrictions on unvaccinated South Africans may make the biggest difference to public health, the economy?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Limited access to restaurants and bars
11% - 161 votes
Limited access to shopping centres
14% - 205 votes
Limited access to live events, including sport matches and festivals
27% - 387 votes
Workplace vaccine mandates
47% - 675 votes
Vote