May pushes no-deal Brexit dangers with key vote just weeks away

British Prime Minister Theresa May holds a press conference at the European Council during the two day EU summit on December 14, 2018 in Brussels, Belgium.  (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
British Prime Minister Theresa May holds a press conference at the European Council during the two day EU summit on December 14, 2018 in Brussels, Belgium. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

UK Prime Minister Theresa May, who has just 28 days to convince rebellious lawmakers to back her Brexit deal, put the UK on high alert over the dangers of crashing out of the European Union without an agreement.

Her Cabinet ministers agreed Tuesday to implement “in full” plans for a no-deal break from the European Union, including 3 500 troops put on standby and 2 billion pounds of funds made available for contingencies. Further warnings to voters and businesses will follow in coming weeks.

May has said she’ll put the terms she negotiated with Brussels to a vote in Parliament the week of January 14, by which time her advisers hope enough lawmakers will have seen the danger of a no-deal split to back it. Authorities predict massive economic damage from leaving the EU without an agreement, including a 25% slump in the pound and house prices down 30%.

“We need to get over to business that this is something they have to prepare for,” Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay said in a pooled TV interview after the Cabinet meeting, while stressing the government’s priority is still to secure a divorce agreement. “We’re sending a clear message that this needs to be much more of a priority.”

May was rebuffed when she tried to persuade EU leaders to sweeten the Brexit deal, after she pulled a planned parliamentary vote in the face of anger in her own Conservative party over arrangements for the post-Brexit Irish border. She will keep talking to the EU, but now wants members of Parliament to be staring over the cliff edge when they vote.


As has been the case throughout the Brexit process, the prime minister’s attempt to present a united front unraveled within minutes. Her spokesman was still briefing reporters about the Cabinet meeting when details of divisions started to leak out.

International Development Secretary Penny Mordaunt used the meeting to press her case for the government to embrace a no-deal outcome, and called for negotiations on a two-year “managed glidepath” out of the bloc, according to a person familiar with the discussions.

That idea was slapped down by Justice Secretary David Gauke, who said a so-called managed no-deal Brexit is not on offer from the EU. Cabinet’s job is “not to propagate unicorns but to slay them,” he told colleagues, according to another official speaking on condition of anonymity.

Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd urged the Cabinet to consider the job losses that would result from a no-deal Brexit. Britain’s future would only be bright if it leaves with an agreement and urged ministers to put politics aside to build a consensus. While she did back stepping up contingency planning, she said it shouldn’t become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

‘Seat Belt’

“Just because you put a seat belt on doesn’t mean you should crash the car,” Rudd said, according to another person familiar with the discussions.

Scottish Secretary David Mundell expressed his strong opposition to a second Brexit referendum, saying it would raise serious democratic issues at a time when the Scottish National Party is pushing for another ballot on independence.

Meanwhile in the House of Commons, opposition parties who want closer ties to European markets than May’s deal will provide, accused the prime minister of “playing games” to win support from members of Parliament.

“This announcement is simply an attempt to scaremonger MPs, businesses, and the British public into supporting the prime minister’s deal,” Jamie Stone, armed forces spokesman for the pro-EU Liberal Democrats, said after the announcement of troops being put on standby. “The government must stop playing games with our future and diverting public resources to solve an outcome they are able to prevent.”

Still, there was a rare respite for May as opposition parties laid bare their differences on the best way to challenge her in Parliament.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s decision this week to seek a motion of no confidence in May - which has no chance of triggering a general election, as opposed to a motion of no confidence in her government, which does - was taunted by his own lawmakers and Ian Blackford, Westminster leader of the Scottish National Party.

Corbyn “has become the midwife for Brexit” and is “letting the government off the hook,” Blackford said. “I am asking him to do what he spectacularly failed to do yesterday and bring forward a motion of no confidence in the government.”

Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1396 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 9031 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1991 votes