Fronting is damaging

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!

Johannesburg - Clear and consistent communication between the parties to a BEE transaction, such as one involving employees, can be the simplest, cheapest and most effective tool to ensure that all parties understand their legal rights and obligations in terms of their relationship.

It can also avoid the unnecessary burdens of an unfounded fronting allegation.

An amendment to the BEE Act in January 2014 made fronting a criminal offence.

Support independent journalism
Subscribe to News24 for just R75 per month to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. You can cancel any time.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Rand - Dollar
15.12
-1.1%
Rand - Pound
20.46
+0.2%
Rand - Euro
17.67
-1.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.95
-0.4%
Rand - Yen
0.14
-0.7%
Gold
1,737.06
-0.8%
Silver
22.48
-0.7%
Palladium
1,884.50
-4.3%
Platinum
968.50
-1.5%
Brent Crude
79.53
+1.8%
Top 40
57,462
-0.6%
All Share
63,784
-0.6%
Resource 10
56,880
-1.5%
Industrial 25
82,305
-0.7%
Financial 15
14,437
+1.3%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
What potential restrictions on unvaccinated South Africans may make the biggest difference to public health, the economy?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Limited access to restaurants and bars
11% - 161 votes
Limited access to shopping centres
14% - 206 votes
Limited access to live events, including sport matches and festivals
27% - 387 votes
Workplace vaccine mandates
47% - 675 votes
Vote