Gordhan's lawyer: 'We are soldiering on'

accreditation
Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan. (Photo: Gallo)
Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan. (Photo: Gallo)

Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan's legal team will be "soldiering on", his attorney Tebogo Malatji has said.

Malatji spoke to Fin24 by phone on Monday, following a ruling by a high court earlier that interdicted the Public Protector's remedial actions against Gordhan.

In her judgment, Potterill established that Gordhan had a prima facie right for the remedial orders to be suspended, pending a court review of her report into the SA Revenue Service "rogue unit".

Among the remedial actions listed was for President Cyril Ramaphosa to take disciplinary action against Gordhan with 30 days. In his submission, the president said he could not carry out any actions against Gordhan while the report was still subject to review by the courts.

Now that the court has granted Gordhan an interdict, his legal team will be making more submissions to the court in relation to the review application, Malatji explained.

Gordhan is seeking the courts to declare that the Public Protector's office and Mkhwebane personally, acted in breach of their constitutional duties to be independent and to exercise their powers and perform their functions without fear, favour or prejudice.

Further, the court must declare that the office and Mkhwebane personally, "dishonestly or, alternatively, recklessly" made findings against Gordhan, "in that they knew that the findings were false or were reckless as to their truth."

Gordhan also want the Public Protector's office and Mkhwebane to be responsible for the costs of the application.

No date has been set for the matter to be heard, Malatji said.

Meanwhile the EFF has said it will approach the Constitutional Court to appeal the interdict. Malatji said this application could also delay the hearing of the review, which he expects could take place in the fourth quarter of the year.

"We will be soldiering on,"' he said. "We will get back to the courts expeditiously," he added.

The Public Protector's office has not yet responded to Fin24's request for comment.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.85
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
20.42
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
17.48
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.94
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,802.28
0.0%
Silver
25.18
0.0%
Palladium
2,675.50
0.0%
Platinum
1,064.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
74.10
+0.4%
Top 40
61,933
+1.0%
All Share
68,064
+1.0%
Resource 10
66,904
+1.5%
Industrial 25
89,442
+0.7%
Financial 15
12,820
+1.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1272 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2020 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3198 votes
Vote