IMF, World Bank 'remote-control' developing nations - Agang

(iStock)
(iStock)

Cape Town - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are “Westernised” institutions, devised in a post-war colonial area with no regard for democracy and transparency, said African National Congress MP Pule Mabe in Parliament. 

Mabe, who is also a member of Parliament’s standing committee on finance, was one of the ANC speakers who debated South Africa’s relationship with the two international financial lenders. 

Agang MP Molapi Andries Plouhamma put the request for the debate forward. In his speech, he argued that South Africa has become “a slave” of the IMF and World Bank, as these institutions have the power to decide if a country succeeds or not. 

“The IMF and World Bank remote-control developing countries, such as South Africa. We should be in control of our own economic direction,” he concluded. 

Another ANC speaker, Bhekizizwe Radebe, also criticised the fact that South Africa is merely a “client state” and a “big market” to the IMF and World Bank. 

“They want developing countries to privatise their state-owned entities,” Radebe said, adding that a country like Bolivia had to “privatise its water supply services to its citizens”. 

Democratic Alliance MP David Maynier slated Agang’s Plouhamma for introducing such a debate while South Africa is facing a plethora of economic problems, such as low growth, high inflation and soaring unemployment. 

“Ratings agencies are circling us like sharks. The fact that we are here today to debate a motion entitled 'Reviewing South Africa’s relationship with the IMF and the World Bank' is testament to the irrelevance of AgangSA.”

Maynier said the debate was not going to help the 8.9 million people in the country who do not have jobs, or have given up looking for jobs.

“What we should be debating is the complete lack of leadership on the economy coming from President Jacob Zuma,” Maynier said. 

The Inkatha Freedom Party's Narend Singh said that “unfortunately” the IMF and World Bank are not always impartial. “Where does it leave developing countries? Luckily South Africa now has an alternative through the Brics bank,” Singh said, adding that the IMF and World Bank need to regain the trust of developing nations if they want to remain relevant. 

The DA’s Alf Lees said what Parliament should have been concerned with is not the IMF and the World Bank but the vast amounts South Africa agreed to contribute towards the establishment of the Brics Bank. 

“In addition to $2bn we’ve already contributed, we need to find another $8bn – or more than R100bn - we foolishly agreed to contribute. All this while taxes are increasing and there are 8.9 million South Africans who don’t have jobs.” 

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

ZAR/USD
17.26
(-1.39)
ZAR/GBP
22.49
(-0.86)
ZAR/EUR
20.24
(-0.98)
ZAR/AUD
12.26
(-0.83)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(-1.20)
Gold
1971.36
(-0.48)
Silver
24.27
(-0.50)
Platinum
907.00
(+0.65)
Brent Crude
43.61
(0.00)
Palladium
2109.49
(+2.25)
All Share
56152.32
(+0.77)
Top 40
51864.25
(+0.96)
Financial 15
9930.27
(-2.22)
Industrial 25
75356.69
(+1.14)
Resource 10
56564.42
(+1.81)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 801 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 5303 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
15% - 1053 votes
Vote