Moody's keeps SA at investment grade - for now

(Picture: Supplied)
(Picture: Supplied)

Cape Town - Global ratings agency Moody's placed South Africa's government debt on review for downgrade late on Friday night, but did not downgrade the debt to junk status. 

The announcement was made just minutes after its rival ratings agency S&P Global downgraded SA's long-term local currency rating to 'BB+', or junk, from 'BBB-' with a stable outlook. 

READ: S&P Global downgrades SA to junk

Following S&P's announcement, the rand, which had been trading around R13.90 to the US dollar before the announcement, immediately lost 25 cents, to trade at R14.15/$. 

It has not yet changed considerably in the wake of the Moody's ratings report. 

"Thus South Africa is still included in the world bond indexes," TreasuryOne explained in a short note after the two announcements. "Moody's will see what happens with elective conference and budget in February 2018."

SA on review

In a ratings announcement on Friday evening at 23:30, Moody's said it had placed SA's Baa3 long-term issuer and senior unsecured bond ratings on review for downgrade.

The Baa3 rating means the debt is still rated as investment grade, at one notch above junk status.

This means that Moody's is the only major ratings agency that has both South Africa’s foreign-currency and rand-denominated debt at investment grade.

FULL STATEMENT: S&P downgrades SA to junk

FULL STATEMENT: Moody's places SA's Baa3 ratings on review for downgrade

Moody's was the third of the big three ratings agencies to announce its November review of SA's credit rating. 

On Thursday Fitch kept SA's long-term foreign and local currency debt ratings at ‘BB+’ - commonly known as junk - with a stable outlook.

In its ratings announcement, Moody's said the decision to place SA's sovereign debt on a review for downgrade was "prompted by a series of recent developments which suggest that South Africa's economic and fiscal challenges are more pronounced than Moody's had previously assumed".

"Growth prospects are weaker and material budgetary revenue shortfalls have emerged alongside increased spending pressures. Altogether, these promise a faster and larger rise in government debt-to-GDP than previously expected," it said. 

Period of assessment

"The review will allow the rating agency to assess the South African authorities' willingness and ability to respond to these rising pressures through growth-supportive fiscal adjustments that raise revenues and contain expenditures; structural economic reforms that ease domestic bottlenecks to growth; and improvements to SOE (state-owned enterprises) governance that contain contingent liabilities," the ratings report read. 

"The review period may not conclude until the size and the composition of the 2018 budget is known next February. This will also allow Moody's to assess the policy implications of political developments during the review period and the likelihood of pressures on South Africa's key policymaking institutions persisting."

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

ZAR/USD
17.03
(+0.31)
ZAR/GBP
21.88
(-0.22)
ZAR/EUR
19.89
(+0.06)
ZAR/AUD
12.06
(-0.11)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.27)
Gold
1881.63
(+1.06)
Silver
23.67
(+3.12)
Platinum
880.00
(+3.52)
Brent Crude
42.29
(0.00)
Palladium
2267.50
(+1.91)
All Share
54718.80
(+2.11)
Top 40
50578.66
(+2.08)
Financial 15
9932.20
(+5.65)
Industrial 25
73991.07
(+1.43)
Resource 10
54366.26
(+1.71)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1378 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 8921 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1977 votes
Vote