Moyane lawyer slams president for failing to abide by deadlines

Former SARS commissioner Tom Moyane in Parliament on Tuesday. (Photo: Jan Gerber, News24)
Former SARS commissioner Tom Moyane in Parliament on Tuesday. (Photo: Jan Gerber, News24)

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s lawyers are five days late in filing an affidavit to substantiate a case against Tom Moyane, suspended commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (SARS). 

This is according to a letter written to the State Attorney on Tuesday, by Moyane’s lawyer Eric Mabuza. 

According to Mabuza, at a meeting with the chairperson of the inquiry Advocate Azhar Bham on June 1, the president’s lawyers Barnes and Millard proposed to deliver the affidavit on June 8. 

“It is now 5 days since the expiry of that self-imposed deadline and the president has failed to deliver on his undertaking. 

“We have not even been granted the usual and expected courtesy of a formal letter either explaining the delay or requesting an extension, or both,” the letter read. 

“Such behaviour is extremely unacceptable, unprofessional and discourteous both towards our client and the chairperson of the inquiry.”

Mabuza raised concern that the delay is becoming “intolerable and costly”. He implored the State attorney to “impress upon the president” that the matter must be treated with urgency in the public interest and even the interest of the SA economy. 

Mabuza also suggested that it would be “extremely unreasonable” to expect Moyane to comply with an agreed timetable, when Ramaphosa’s lawyers who proposed it, had themselves failed to comply with it. 

“We await your urgent response to this letter and/or the urgent delivery of the promised  documentation,” Mabuza concluded. 

The lead up to Moyane’s disciplinary inquiry has been plagued with several issues. 

Moyane had first challenged the fairness of the process, and picked on technical aspects of the inquiry such as that evidence would be submitted in writing. Moyane, who is facing 12 charges of misconduct, wanted to make oral presentations instead. 

According to the disciplinary hearing’s terms of reference, oral evidence would be heard only at the panel chair’s discretion, Fin24 previously reported.

Moyane had also demanded that the State cover his legal costs.

His legal team had also taken issue with retired Constitutional Court Judge Kate O'Regan, who was initially named chair of the inquiry. Moyane’s lawyers had flagged a O'Regan's conflict of interest because of her role in Corruption Watch. 

The president then appointed Bham as the presiding officer of the inquiry.

Presidency spokesperson Khusela Diko previously defended the disciplinary process as being fair and procedurally correct.

Diko was not immediately available to comment on new developments on the matter, after Fin24 attempted to reach her.  

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

ZAR/USD
16.33
(-0.06)
ZAR/GBP
21.08
(-0.04)
ZAR/EUR
19.33
(-0.03)
ZAR/AUD
11.90
(-0.03)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(-1.15)
Gold
1949.72
(+0.03)
Silver
26.74
(+0.09)
Platinum
928.80
(+0.44)
Brent Crude
43.52
(-0.32)
Palladium
2356.01
(+0.63)
All Share
54673.65
(-0.66)
Top 40
50399.16
(-0.59)
Financial 15
9841.32
(-2.14)
Industrial 25
72558.00
(-1.08)
Resource 10
55438.10
(+0.58)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1297 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 8622 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1898 votes
Vote