Ramaphosa promises no job losses at Eskom

.
.

President Cyril Ramaphosa has said the government won’t cut jobs at state power utility, Eskom, as it divides the company into three separate businesses.

Ramaphosa announced the plan to divide the company into generation, transmission and distribution units in February, and there was an immediate backlash from labor unions who are concerned that the plan could lead to job losses. Eskom has 47 000 workers, a figure the World Bank has said is 66% too high, and debt in excess of R430bn. 

“What we will need to do going forward is to strengthen Eskom,” Ramaphosa said in an interview with Newzroom Afrika, a Johannesburg-based television station that started broadcasting today. “As as the restructuring job unfolds, no we don’t see the loss of jobs.”

Eskom has been described by Goldman Sachs Group as the biggest threat to the South African economy and isn’t generating sufficient cash to meet its maintenance costs, resulting in frequent power cuts so far this year. It has been embroiled in corruption scandals. The government agreed to give it a record R69bn bailout in February.

The company won’t cut power to consumers this winter, Ramaphosa said, which runs from June until the end of August.

ZAR/USD
17.03
(-0.33)
ZAR/GBP
21.28
(-0.31)
ZAR/EUR
19.25
(-0.25)
ZAR/AUD
11.84
(-0.02)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(-0.20)
Gold
1784.09
(-0.04)
Silver
18.18
(-0.43)
Platinum
817.00
(-0.37)
Brent Crude
43.07
(+0.70)
Palladium
1914.00
(-0.16)
All Share
54846.28
(+0.60)
Top 40
50503.91
(+0.65)
Financial 15
10134.53
(-0.15)
Industrial 25
76434.98
(-0.16)
Resource 10
51142.00
(+2.00)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'm not really directly affected
18% - 1653 votes
I am taking a hit, but should be able to recover in the next year
23% - 2176 votes
My finances have been devastated
34% - 3229 votes
It's still too early to know what the full effect will be
25% - 2350 votes
Vote