SONA: Zuma vows radical economic overhaul

President Jacob Zuma during SONA 2017.
President Jacob Zuma during SONA 2017.

Cape Town - South African President Jacob Zuma’s State of the Nation Address (SONA) descended into chaos as opposition lawmakers brawled with security guards, riot police fired stun grenades outside Parliament and rival party supporters clashed in the streets of Cape Town.

More on SONA:

Zuma sheds light on radical economic transformation vision
Economy growing, but not enough to create jobs - Zuma
Zuma ignores state owned entities in SONA
Gov't to pursue direct involvement in mining - Zuma
Zuma steers clear of nuclear in SONA
SONA: Zuma commits SA to renewable energy
Zuma lauds Ramaphosa over national minimum wage deal
Rand recovers after SONA chaos, now focus turns to Budget

Parliamentary speaker Baleka Mbete summoned the guards to eject members of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) on Thursday after they repeatedly interrupted proceedings and raised points of order in a bid to stop the president from speaking. EFF members, wearing their trademark red coveralls and miners’ helmets, shouted “tsotsi,” or criminal, as Zuma entered the chamber, while their counterparts from the ruling African National Congress tried to drown them out by chanting “president” and “ANC”.

As the security agents moved in to remove them, EFF members engaged in fistfights and swung at them with their helmets before being wrestled from the chamber. The main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, and most other opposition groups then walked out of the assembly. Outside Parliament, EFF and ANC supporters clashed before being separated by police.

“Parliament has been militarised,” EFF leader Julius Malema said outside the chamber after he was thrown out. “This place has been declared a state of emergency.”

Deepening tensions

The sight of the legislature being reduced to fistfights and the security clampdown outside showed the growing tensions in South Africa’s democracy that have deepened under Zuma’s controversial administration. The president has been implicated in a series of scandals ranging from taxpayer money spent on his private home to his relationship with a wealthy family accused of using the friendship to exert influence over the government.

Zuma resumed his speech 80 minutes after he was due to begin. He pledged to engineer a radical economic overhaul to tackle poverty, give the black majority a bigger stake in the economy and reduce racial income disparities that persist almost 23 years after the end of white-minority rule. The government will use legislation and the R1.4 trillion ($104m) its spends annually on goods, services and infrastructure to achieve its goals, he said.

“Only 10% of the top 100 companies on the Johannesburg stock exchange are owned by black South Africans,” Zuma said. “White households earn at least five times more than black households. The majority of black people are still economically disempowered. They are dissatisfied with the economic gains from liberation.”

The ANC suffered its worst electoral performance last year, when it lost control of Pretoria, the capital, and the economic hub of Johannesburg. While Zuma has said he’ll step down as head of the ANC in December, his term as president continues until 2019.

State intervention

In his speech, Zuma said the state will take a bigger direct stake in mining industry and finalise laws that will set out required levels of black ownership for the industry. While the government will also take steps to accelerate the redistribution of land to address racial ownership disparities, a law that allows compulsory expropriation will be referred back to Parliament to ensure it complies with the constitution, he said.

The scope of the security lockdown for Zuma’s speech was unprecedented since the end of apartheid. Zuma ordered 441 soldiers to join about 6 000 police maintain order during his speech. The police erected barricades and closed roads around the legislature, preventing anti-government protesters from approaching the precinct.

The rand weakened as lawmakers and party supporters clashed before paring losses to be little changed at 13.4220 per dollar ahead of 22:00 in Johannesburg.

“The violence and disorder witnessed this evening is the direct result of a corrupt political party, clinging to power by using fear tactics and intimidation,” Democratic Alliance leader Mmusi Maimane told reporters after walking out of the legislature.

Slowing economy

Under Zuma’s presidency the economy has floundered, with the Treasury estimating 0.5% growth last year, and the 27% jobless rate is the highest since 2003. The nation is struggling to retain its investment-grade status at S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

The EFF repeated its charge that Zuma, 74, was no longer a legitimate president after the nation’s top court ruled last year that he violated the constitution by not obeying an order by the public protector to repay state money spent to renovate his private residence. The ANC has used its 62% majority in Parliament to shield him from opposition motions to impeach him.

Zuma was also implicated in another report released by the public protector last year, which implied that he allowed members of a wealthy family who are in business with his son to influence cabinet appointments and the issuing of state contracts. Zuma has denied ever intentionally breaking the law and has challenged the report in court.

The president’s approval rating has slumped to four out of 10 from 5.7 in November 2014, a survey of 3 416 South African adults conducted by research company Ipsos between October 25 and November 28 for broadcaster eNCA that was released Wednesday showed.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 797 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 5282 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
15% - 1047 votes