Tax boost to government as mineral prices soar


Rocketing platinum group metal (PGM) prices, especially palladium, is good news for the government as well as for shareholders of the companies that produce them.

The government is not often mentioned in the same breath in a discussion about shareholder returns, but it benefits significantly from a strong financial performance by the sector – if only government officials would recognise it more when it came to policy.

Rand-based prices for several South African-mined metals and minerals were significantly higher in 2019: up 38% year-on-year for the PGM basket, which includes platinum, palladium and rhodium; 20% higher for gold; and iron ore was 46% higher. 

The only downside was for thermal coal, where export coal prices fell 22% but have started to record an interesting bounce this year.

This has been reflected in the anticipated tax take. According to RMB Morgan Stanley, corporate tax paid by Anglo American Platinum (Amplats) will be about R5bn for 2019, while Kumba Iron Ore will pay close to R10bn. 

There are also important contributions from Sibanye-Stillwater, Impala Platinum and Assore, an investment holding company that has access to the manganese deposits of the Northern Cape province.

The total tax take for the sector is about R27bn in 2019, up from about R18bn in the previous year. The numbers could have been better, if not for certain capital allowances provided for previous years of losses incurred by mining firms – such is the commodity cycle.

“The single largest boost to the tax take arises from the PGM industry,” said RMB Morgan Stanley analysts in a report. “We estimate that the increase in 2019 taxes will possibly be less than would otherwise have been expected due to the dampening impact of carried forward capital allowances and assessed losses from prior years,” it said.

Nonetheless, 2019 was a very good year for the mining sector and stakeholders, including unions which extracted wage increases in the PGM sector well in excess of inflation. 

And these numbers look like chicken feed compared to the likely contribution in 2020, provided gains made by certain minerals are sustained. 

Spot prices surged in January with PGMs up 43% and gold 11% stronger, while iron ore has been flat. As a result, Amplats’ tax take alone this year could increase to a figure of around R10bn. 

And that’s just one company and it excludes royalties.Including royalties, Amplats is set to pay about R12bn to the fiscus. Other companies exposed to the PGM complex are similarly positioned to contribute, such as Sibanye-Stillwater, which could pay R5bn in royalties and just under that in corporate tax this year, assuming prices remain at spot.

All in all, the anticipated tax paid by the mining sector this year, assuming all things equal, will be about R40bn, more than double that achieved two years ago.

For a country with a fiscal deficit equal to about 6% of GDP for the foreseeable future, this income from metals is a welcome relief. 

All in all, mining taxes make up about 10% of total corporate taxes paid in SA. The question, though, is how long the minerals cycle can continue, especially as economists who gathered at the World Economic Forum in Davos pondered over the likelihood of the world economy slowing.

There is a risk to bulk minerals such as iron ore. Last year, a supply deficit developed after a slimes dam disaster at Vale’s Brumadinho facility in Brazil, in which hundreds of people were killed, resulted in a shutdown of a portion of the company’s production. 

However, some of that production – if not all – will come back into the market over time.Palladium and rhodium price increases, which have been driving the increased tax take for government, seem to have little holding them back, according to analysts.

Firstly, increased production from SA is deemed to be unlikely, especially in an era of continual power interruptions. Data released by Stats SA showed that SA’s output of PGMs fell 13.5% in November compared with the same period a year earlier.

Secondly, a rebound in automotive production, and increasing legislation on emissions – PGMs are used to make auto catalysts fitted to car engines – are likely to continue to stoke demand.According to TD Securities, a Canadian stock brokerage, the increase in palladium, which has gained 25% in two weeks during January, is not a bubble. 

“We see little evidence of excess in speculative activity, which suggests the rally is fundamentally driven, despite the parabolic move,” said TD Securities in a recent note. 

“In fact, our dry powder analysis suggests that traders hold a below-average total position, and positions per trader are also below average, thereby reducing the risk of a sharp reversal,” it said.

“We think the rally has room to run as periods of extreme scarcity send prices sharply higher. No substitutes imply that near-term demand will not be destroyed.” 

Said RMB Morgan Stanley: “We see a reasonable likelihood that prices and sector profitability will remain elevated and move higher in 2020.” It judged the fundamental PGM market deficit at about 500 000 to 1m ounces while tightening emission standards would drive “... an uplift in PGM loadings that is somewhat delinked from the macro backdrop (and slowing world economic growth)”. 

This article originally appeared in the 6 February edition of finweek. Buy and download the magazine here or subscribe to our newsletter here.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Should government have assigned a majority shareholding in SAA to the private sector?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, It's a good decision
64% - 159 votes
Not a good move
9% - 23 votes
Too early to tell
27% - 66 votes