Nobel Foundation divests funds linked to oil

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
 Top oil producers will cut global petroleum output by nearly a 10th.
Top oil producers will cut global petroleum output by nearly a 10th.
  • The Nobel Foundation has sold off over R580 million in assets in a fund that does not have strong enough restrictions on oil.
  • The foundation's head says Nobel laureates must know where their prize money comes from. 
  • The foundation has been criticised in recent years for holding stakes in controversial sectors. 


The foundation that finances and organises the Nobel Prizes announced on Tuesday that it had sold off its oil sector assets, after also withdrawing from the coal industry.

"This year we have sold off shares in oil," Vidar Helgesen, the new head of the Stockholm-based foundation, told public broadcaster SR.

According to the former Norwegian environment minister, the fund had sold off nearly 350 million Swedish kronor (over R580 million) of assets placed in a fund that did not have strong enough restrictions on oil.

Helgesen added that it is important that Nobel laureates know where their prize money comes from.

"The public has expectations that everyone who has capital to invest, should invest that wisely," Helgesen said.

The Nobel Foundation, which was set up after Alfred Nobel bequeathed much of his wealth to create the prizes, manages a portfolio of roughly 4.8 billion Swedish kronor in investments, according to its latest balance sheet.

Nobel Prizes, which reward those who have provided "greatest benefit to humankind", come with a sum of 10 million kronor per discipline that are financed by these investments.

The foundation has been criticised in recent years for holding — indirectly through investment funds — stakes in controversial sectors such as arms and tobacco.

It had already recently divested itself of its coal-related holdings, Helgesen added.

Global carbon emissions are set to hit an all-time high by 2023 despite international commitments to cut them, the International Energy Agency warned Tuesday.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.85
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
20.42
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
17.48
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.94
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,802.28
0.0%
Silver
25.18
0.0%
Palladium
2,675.50
0.0%
Platinum
1,064.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
74.10
+0.4%
Top 40
61,933
+1.0%
All Share
68,064
+1.0%
Resource 10
66,904
+1.5%
Industrial 25
89,442
+0.7%
Financial 15
12,820
+1.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1273 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2020 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3199 votes
Vote