MONEY CLINIC | Can I upgrade my cellphone contract while under debt review?

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
A cellphone contract is considered to be a service agreement, not a credit agreement.
A cellphone contract is considered to be a service agreement, not a credit agreement.
Delmaine Donson/Getty Images

A Fin24 reader who took out a cellphone contract before entering into debt review wants to know if it's possible to have upgrade her cellphone contract.

She writes:

I have a cellphone contract that I took before I went into debt review. My contract is due for an upgrade. Can I do a cellphone contract upgrade while under debt review?

Benay Sager, chief operating officer at DebtBusters, responds:  

A cellphone contract is considered to be a service agreement - not a credit agreement. As a result, it is generally not part of the debt counselling (or debt review) process (unless the consumer is in arrears with their cellphone contract, in which case the cellphone contract could become part of the process). In this case, given that the consumer is still enjoying a cellphone contract, they are probably not in arrears, and therefore the cellphone contract is being paid by the consumer outside of the debt counselling process.

We further assume that the cellphone contract the consumer is paying towards is budgeted for as part of the debt counselling process, and that their new upgrade will not cost significantly more than what they were paying previously. If so, our view is that since this is merely an upgrade, the consumer should have no problems in trying to upgrade/update their cellphone contract.

On the other hand, if the consumer will pay significantly more towards the upgraded plan, then they would need to discuss this with their debt counsellor to make sure their budget caters for this additional amount. 

The cellphone provider may conduct a credit check and would potentially become aware that the consumer is under debt counselling – however, since there is already a contract in place, this should not become an issue with the consumer. From time to time, we come across consumers who want to rent a new apartment while under debt counselling – a similar situation to cellphone contract.

In those cases, the debt counsellor could provide the consumer a letter confirming that they are under debt counselling and are maintaining regular payments. So, for any avoidance of doubt, we would advise the consumer to take along such a letter when trying to upgrade their cellphone contract.

Questions may be edited for brevity and clarity.

  • Have a money problem that needs solving? Fin24 can help! Send your question to

Disclaimer: Fin24 cannot be held liable for any investment decisions made based on the advice given by independent financial service providers. Under the ECT Act and to the fullest extent possible under the applicable law, Fin24 disclaims all responsibility or liability for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of this site in any manner.

Get the biggest business stories emailed to you every weekday.

Go to the Fin24 front page.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
What potential restrictions on unvaccinated South Africans may make the biggest difference to public health, the economy?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Limited access to restaurants and bars
11% - 138 votes
Limited access to shopping centres
15% - 179 votes
Limited access to live events, including sport matches and festivals
26% - 326 votes
Workplace vaccine mandates
48% - 591 votes