MONEY CLINIC | Should I pay a R200 000 deposit on a buy-to-let property, or invest in a unit trust?

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
It is also important to mention your retirement savings plan, and whether you are on target to meet it.
It is also important to mention your retirement savings plan, and whether you are on target to meet it.
krisanapong detraphiphat
A Fin24 reader considers investing in property but is concerned he may be losing out on returns from a unit trust. 

He writes:

I'm a young adult at the age of 30. I have R250 000 cash and I currently have a bond on my house.... I have pre-qualified for an additional R1.5 million home loan.

My idea is to put down a R200 000 deposit on an R800 000 buy-to-let investment property, with R50 000 to go to transfer fees. Then later purchase a third place for R900 000 once I've saved up some money again.

My question is, should I put the deposit down on the house? Or apply for 100% bond and rather put the R200 000 in a unit trust? I feel in the current market situation, a property purchase would be good (property in Cape Town in a steady area with solid growth). But I also don't want to lose out on potential returns of the unit trust. 

Lauren Davids, Senior Investment Consultant at 10X Investments, responds:

Please note that we cannot legally offer financial advice without first doing a full analysis of your financial needs; we can merely offer insight and information to help you make your decision.  

Although you have asked just one question, there are two aspects to consider:

  • Specifically, should you invest R200 000 in a buy-to-let bond or in a unit trust?
  • On a related manner, should you be investing in (more) property?

1) We cannot provide a definitive answer to your stated question. It depends entirely on the specific numbers related to the property, in terms of how much debt you can afford to take on and still remain cashflow positive (which is the ideal for a buy-to-let investment).

Ideally, that number will be 100%, as this maximises both the tax deduction and your long-term return from any price appreciation (assuming this will be positive), while also permitting you to invest in a unit trust. 

However, in doing this calculation, you need to allow for some margin of error, as the property may not have a tenant all the time. In this case, providing a margin of error would mean paying down some of the bond. Whatever money is left beyond that margin for error can then be invested in a unit trust. 

An alternate way of looking at this – more relevant if the choice is to pay down your own mortgage or invest in a unit trust – is to compare your interest cost saving against your potential unit trust return.

We don't know what interest rate you qualify for, but the prime lending rate in South Africa is currently 7%. In other words, by putting down a R200 000 deposit, you save paying interest of R14 000 pa, at 7% pa (if that is what you qualify for). Depending on your marginal tax rate (we don't know, say 30%), you are effectively earning 10% on the R200 000 deposit, pre-tax. You can take that return that to the bank, at least until interest rates change. 

They are unlikely to go lower from here, ie if anything your future hurdle rate (the rate of return you need to beat in your unit trust) is going to be higher.

Compare that to what you might earn in a unit trust investment. This depends on many factors: the amount of market risk you are willing to take, the performance of the market/underlying asset classes, the performance of your fund manager, the amount of fees you pay, future inflation and the length of time you hold the investment. Although future returns are always uncertain, and can be highly volatile in the short-term, real (or after-inflation) returns become more predictable or mean-reverting as the investment term lengthens, even if you assume a large degree of market risk.     

Let’s assume you invest in a traditional balanced high equity fund. You use an indexing strategy that tracks the market return of each underlying asset class. Historically, such a portfolio has returned around 6% pa above inflation, but that number appears way too high in the context of where we are now. Realistically, 4% pa over the long-term appears a more reasonable and prudent assumption.

Let's further assume you pay low fees (say 1% pa, all in). Let's also assume that long-term inflation over your investment term averages 4.5%, which approximates current inflation expectations discounted in the bond market. In that scenario, your unit trust may earn you a long-term return of 4% real plus 4,5% inflation less 1% in fees, ie 7,5% pa net, considerably less than paying down your bond. Of course, in the short term it could also be much higher, or much lower than that. 

If you choose active management instead of index tracking, you are likely to pay more in fees, possibly double, and your return could be higher, although it will likely be lower.  

In this scenario, the prudent approach seems obvious.  

2) The second (unspoken) question relates to diversification: Should you be investing exclusively in property, or should you diversify? The prudent approach, of course, is to never put all your eggs in one basket. Buy-to-let property investments come with many risks that you are no doubt aware of: your property standing empty for some months, pressure on rental yields in a weak economy, rising interest rates, rising holding costs related to levies, rates, etc, unexpected maintenance costs, advertising cost, transaction costs, illiquid markets etc.

Holding just one or two buy-to-let properties exacerbates your concentration risk even more. One bad tenant can ruin your investment.   

So while it may be okay, to hold one or two property investments, representing maybe 10% of a portfolio that is broadly diversified across other asset classes, such as shares, bonds and foreign markets, investing 90% of your savings in one or two properties is a high-risk proposition that is unlikely to provide a commensurate reward.  

Questions may be edited for brevity and clarity.

  • Have a money problem that needs solving? Fin24 can help! Send your question to editor@fin24.com

Disclaimer: Fin24 cannot be held liable for any investment decisions made based on the advice given by independent financial service providers. Under the ECT Act and to the fullest extent possible under the applicable law, Fin24 disclaims all responsibility or liability for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of this site in any manner.

Get the biggest business stories emailed to you every weekday.

Go to the Fin24 front page.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.85
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
20.42
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
17.48
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.94
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,802.28
0.0%
Silver
25.18
0.0%
Palladium
2,675.50
0.0%
Platinum
1,064.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
74.10
+0.4%
Top 40
61,933
+1.0%
All Share
68,064
+1.0%
Resource 10
66,904
+1.5%
Industrial 25
89,442
+0.7%
Financial 15
12,820
+1.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1272 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2020 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3196 votes
Vote