Alcohol bans force South African wineries to rethink trade plans

0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
President Cyril Ramaphosa last week lifted the nation's third alcohol ban since the onset of the Covid-19 crisis (Getty Images)
President Cyril Ramaphosa last week lifted the nation's third alcohol ban since the onset of the Covid-19 crisis (Getty Images)
  • Government lifted its third alcohol ban last week, but there is no guarantee there won't be renewed bans.
  • Wine producers had to rely on exports, but faced cash flow and storage problems.
  • Industry bodies have warned of the impact of the ban on smaller sellers and its contribution to surging illegal trade. There's also been a slump in tax revenue.


Before the arrival of Covid-19 in South Africa, Berene Sauls had dreams of growing grapes near her home village and expanding her fledgling wine business.

The 37-year-old makes about 8 000 bottles a year of Tesselaarsdal Wines, and is one of hundreds of wine makers dotted across the hills and valleys near Cape Town that make up the country's main producing region. She buys grapes from nearby Babylon Vineyards, but has bought a property as a place to eventually harvest her own.

Yet the coronavirus outbreak has forced Sauls to rethink her plans: South Africa's government has used bans on alcohol sales as a go-to method to curb the spread of infection – both when the pandemic was in its infancy and again when cases have surged. A third prohibition was lifted on Tuesday after five weeks, but there's no assurance there won't be more.

"It really hurts business and has a ripple effect on the hospitality industry and farmers," Sauls said by phone. "The aftermath is really sad."

The government's rationale for imposing bans is twofold – to discourage large gatherings and to ease the burden on hospitals from alcohol-related accidents. The most recent shuttering of liquor stores was accompanied by a 9 pm curfew, and supporters of the policy were quick to highlight the unusual lack of admissions to emergency rooms over the new year.

"During the early onset of the second wave everything was still open, so we had surgeries and trauma," said Marc Mendelson, head of infectious diseases at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town. Reduced drinking helps ease the burden on the health system, he added.

The drinks-making industry has largely taken an opposing stance. South African Breweries, the country's biggest beer maker and unit of Anheuser-Busch InBev, responded to the latest ban with legal action, and says more than 165 000 jobs have already been lost.

Industry bodies including the Liquor Traders' Formation have warned of the impact on smaller sellers, particularly in poor communities, while highlighting a surge in illegal trade. There's also been a hit to the National Treasury from a slump in tax revenue.

Yet Distell Group Holdings, South Africa's biggest wine and spirits producer, reported Wednesday that domestic revenue held steady during the six months through December, despite losing 41 trading days. The maker of mass-market wines such as Nederburg and Two Oceans got a boost from drinkers stockpiling after being caught short by the length of the first ban, which was more than six weeks longer than initially announced.

The wine industry was also able to fall back on exports, which amounted to 319.2 million liters in 2020, only 0.2% less than the previous year, according to industry body Wines of South Africa. Volumes held steady even though transporting alcohol was banned for much of a five-week period that ended April, though 2019 output was affected by a lengthy drought, according to WOSA spokeswoman Maryna Calow.

While the winemakers have proven to be resilient, there remain a number of potential long-term challenges that may not be easy to shake off, Johan van Zyl, Distell's director of the global supply chain, said in an interview.

During the first two bans, "we ended up in a situation where we couldn't pay the cellars on normal terms, who then couldn't pay the farmers, so there was a huge cashflow problem," Van Zyl said. "We were able to make a plan to pay our farmers, but we believe not all were so lucky."

With the third prohibition, the problem of storage was added to the mix.

South Africa's harvesting season typically runs from late January through to mid-April, where enough grapes for about 1 billion liters of wine are picked. Once they are pressed and the juice is fermented and aged, the liquid has to be stored. With a processing capacity of about 720 million liters and around 480 million liters of storage, a lack of room quickly becomes an issue.

"By December, the industry had about two thirds of a full harvest in stock," Van Zyl said. "So all of your storage space is already consumed, and some of your processing space."

For Berene Sauls, her dreams of adding grapevines, additional storage and a tasting room to her new property remain intact - but they will take longer to realise.

"That was supposed to be a five-year plan but I've had to review it to an eight-year plan," she said. "I am probably one of the more fortunate wine makers who exports to seven different countries. I've been able to keep demand."


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
USD/ZAR
14.29
(-0.0)
GBP/ZAR
19.93
(+0.2)
EUR/ZAR
17.20
(+0.5)
AUD/ZAR
11.05
(+0.2)
JPY/ZAR
0.13
(+0.5)
Gold
1,776.45
(+0.3)
Silver
25.85
(+0.1)
Platinum
1,190.00
(-1.6)
Brent Crude
67.05
(+0.4)
Palladium
2,744.50
(-2.5)
All Share
66,836
(-1.9)
Top 40
61,117
(-1.9)
Financial 15
12,162
(-2.1)
Industrial 25
86,452
(-2.1)
Resource 10
68,586
(-1.7)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, and I've gotten it.
21% - 1286 votes
No, I did not.
52% - 3202 votes
My landlord refused
28% - 1719 votes
Vote