for subscribers

ANALYSIS | Where does the regulator's stance on Covid-19 claims leave insurers?

Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
(iStock)
(iStock)

The Financial Sector Conduct Authority's pronouncement that insurers cannot use the lockdown to reject claims has thrown a new curve ball for the industry. Many big players who have not paid out business interruption claims argue that the lockdown is national government-imposed restriction on the entire country, and their underwriting models never factored in that risk when these products were designed.

Avior Capital Markets' head of research, Warwick Bam, said the biggest problem was that insurers were not pricing the policy or reserving for the risk of a lockdown scenario, nor was the regulator monitoring the solvency of insurers for such an event. If they are forced to pay up, he said the financial stability of short-term insurers will potentially be under threat.

FSCA's stance in line with that of other regulators

There’s more to this story
Subscribe to News24 and get access to our exclusive journalism and features today.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
ZAR/USD
16.59
(+0.81)
ZAR/GBP
21.39
(+0.98)
ZAR/EUR
19.49
(+0.57)
ZAR/AUD
11.93
(+0.41)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.86)
Gold
1904.66
(+0.90)
Silver
23.75
(+1.75)
Platinum
898.00
(+0.88)
Brent Crude
42.12
(+1.78)
Palladium
2309.28
(+0.72)
All Share
54446.78
(+0.34)
Top 40
50159.14
(+0.23)
Financial 15
10158.72
(+0.86)
Industrial 25
73766.43
(+0.79)
Resource 10
53032.08
(-0.66)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1404 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 9096 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 2001 votes
Vote