European Parliament backs EU's big tech clampdown

(Pic: iStock)
(Pic: iStock)
  • European Parliament has given the EU executive strong backing to draw up new rules against big tech that could become the most draconian ever against the likes of Google, Amazon or Facebook.
  • In a series of initiative reports, a vast majority of MEPs called on the EU to "future-proof" rules on tech firms that would go further and faster than competition law.
  • The EU's proposals are expected in December and will face a ratification process by parliament and member states that could take months.


European Parliament has given the EU executive strong backing to draw up new rules against big tech that could become the most draconian ever against the likes of Google, Amazon or Facebook.

MEPs meeting in Brussels on Tuesday weighed in on the "Digital Services Act", an upcoming EU legislation that aims to put sweeping limits on the tech giants and even see the firms forced to split up.

In a series of something called initiative reports, a huge majority of MEPs called on the EU to "future-proof" rules on tech firms that would go further and faster than competition law.

If adopted, the rules would again place Europe at the forefront of a global clampdown on big tech just as antitrust authorities in the US launched proceedings against Google, largely following the EU's playbook.

"The eternally long competition proceedings against Google and other platform operators show that they can hardly be dealt with using the normal instruments of competition law", said German MEP Markus Ferber.

Stricter rules "with bite" are needed, he added.

The bill is currently being drawn up by the European Commission and leaks have showed an ambition to come out strongly against the firms.

The heart of the proposals will be to update the e-commerce directive, the law that currently governs online business, but that dates back to 2000, when Google was at its infancy and Facebook did not exist.

'Things will change'

MEPs insisted that the law tackle a myriad of perceived problems created by big tech - from the rise of disinformation, the proliferation of hate speech, to the overwhelming market power of US giants that stifles the rise of rivals.

To do so, the law will create the notion of online "gate-keepers", a group of 10 to 20 companies that Brussels says have become so powerful that they now need to special rules to govern them with a clear list of do's and don'ts.

These could include bans on featuring their own services in search results or pre-installing apps such as browsers or maps on smartphones and many others.

Margrethe Vestager, the EU's executive vice president for competition, is key to conceiving the proposal and said the viewpoints by MEPs were in line with what her teams wanted to do.

"Fundamentally, we share the same goals," Vestager told MEPs in a debate ahead of the vote.

"We will have to say to some of the gatekeepers, the largest platforms, that things will change," she said.

The EU's proposals are expected in December and will face a months-long ratification process by parliament and member states.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
ZAR/USD
15.20
(-0.63)
ZAR/GBP
20.32
(-0.45)
ZAR/EUR
18.12
(-0.61)
ZAR/AUD
11.20
(-0.65)
ZAR/JPY
0.15
(-0.78)
Gold
1809.97
(+0.12)
Silver
23.29
(-0.15)
Platinum
963.00
(+0.40)
Brent Crude
48.73
(+1.57)
Palladium
2368.48
(+2.46)
All Share
57923.69
(+0.31)
Top 40
53084.13
(+0.27)
Financial 15
11645.28
(+0.04)
Industrial 25
79993.34
(+0.20)
Resource 10
52790.93
(+0.35)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, and I've gotten it.
22% - 340 votes
No, I did not.
51% - 804 votes
My landlord refused
28% - 436 votes
Vote