'Nobody really knows' what happened to R5.5bn at SA's worst-run municipalities - AG

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Auditor General Tsakani Maluleke.
Auditor General Tsakani Maluleke.
GCIS
  • Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke has presented the key outcomes of her office's annual probe into the financial status of SA's 257 municipalities. 
  • Maluleke says that "nobody really knows for sure" what happened to around R5.5 billion in funds sent by national government to 22 of the country's most opaque municipalities. 
  • Many municipalities in the Free State simply didn't submit any financials at all, she says. 

Nobody really knows what happened to about R5.5 billion in funds that flowed through 22 of South Africa's worst-run municipalities in a year, according to Auditor-General (AG) Tsakani Maluleke.

Maluleke was on Tuesday morning briefing Parliament on the outcomes of her office's annual probe into SA's 257 municipalities, for the year to end-June 2020.

She said that 22 municipalities - just under one in ten - received a "disclaimer of audit opinion" from her office for that period.  

A disclaimer is the worst result that a municipality can receive from the AG. It means the municipality has not provided enough evidence on which to base an audit opinion.

The AG said that, in aggregate, the 22 municipalities received R6.49 billion in funds from national government at the start of the 2019/20 year. 

At the end of the period, they had just under R1 billion left in their bank accounts. 

But what happened to the funds in the intervening period?

"Nobody's reporting, nobody's accounting, and nobody really knows for sure what has happened to this money," she said.

The 22 municipalities were characterised by "relative chaos" with no commitment to any financial transparency. 

Of the 22 municipalities, seven were in the North West, four in Mpumalanga, four in KwaZulu-Natal, four in the Eastern Cape, two in the Northern Cape, and one in the Western Cape. 

What about the Free State? 

The true state if affairs may be worse, said Maluleke, as the AG's office was unable to complete many audits for the Free State. 

Many of the province's municipalities either submitted information too late, or simply didn't send anything at all to the AG. 

"We are unable to say much about the state of disclaimer opinions in that province," she said. 

The AG also told Parliament that ten of the municipalities that received a disclaimer of audit opinion spent a total of R105 million on outside consultants to try to help them fix their books. 

She did not name the ten municipalities at Tuesday's briefing. She will be publicly releasing her full report later in the month. 

"That's really, on average, R10 million apiece for consultants to compile financials, and yet, at the end of the audit period, we were unable to offer any audit opinion on those financials," she said. 

Consultants for 'basic' financials 

Maluleke said that in the year under review across all municipalities, just over R1 billion was spent on consultants to help them compile their own financial statements. This is roughly R150 million more than in the 2018/19 financial year.

She said her office had again noted the use of expensive private sector consultants to put "basic" financial statements together.

"There is nothing wrong with looking for external experts to help one deal with the more complex aspects of compiling financials," she said. 

"However, if year-on-year the municipality relies on consultants to help them put basic financial statements together, then we are concerned," she said. 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.79
+0.4%
Rand - Pound
20.35
+0.3%
Rand - Euro
17.41
+0.4%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.89
+0.4%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.3%
Gold
1,802.28
0.0%
Silver
25.18
0.0%
Palladium
2,675.50
0.0%
Platinum
1,064.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
74.10
+0.4%
Top 40
61,933
+1.0%
All Share
68,064
+1.0%
Resource 10
66,904
+1.5%
Industrial 25
89,442
+0.7%
Financial 15
12,820
+1.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1287 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2038 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3233 votes
Vote