US companies for months bemoaned tariffs on Chinese imports taking effect Friday. Now they fear the worst is yet to come in an escalating confrontation with Beijing over trade.
Duties on $34bn of Chinese goods will take effect at 12:01 a.m. in Washington, the US Trade Representative’s office confirmed in an email Thursday. China has promised to immediately impose retaliatory duties of a similar size on American goods.
The US has also released a list of an additional $16bn in products targeted for tariffs, and President Donald Trump has ordered USTR to identify another $200bn of Chinese products on which to possibly levy duties.
Companies including General Electric and trade groups such as the US Chamber of Commerce say tariffs are the wrong way to address allegations of intellectual property theft by China, and that firms are making contingency plans should a trade war ensue.
Some businesses tried to persuade the Trump administration to back down by saying they’d be left with no choice but to consider reducing production, firing workers and even shifting operations out of the US to account for the added costs from import tariffs.
“With tariffs against China taking effect, American consumers are one step closer to feeling the full effects of a trade war,” Matthew Shay, president of the National Retail Federation, said. “Reining in China’s abusive trade policies is a goal shared by many countries, but a strategy based on unilateral tariffs is the wrong approach and it has to stop.”
SEMI, which represents semiconductor companies and others in the manufacturing supply chain for the electronics industry, estimates that the initial round of tariffs will increase costs for its members by between $20m and $35m. The second list of $16 billion in goods - which is more heavily focused on technology products - could produce a hit of at least $500m, said Jay Chittooran, a public policy manager for the group.
The American Chemistry Council estimates that the second wave of promised tariffs will affect $2.2bn in imports of chemicals and plastics from China and $5.4bn in US exports to China from retaliatory duties, said Ed Brzytwa, director of international trade.
The Trump administration did remove some products from an initial tariffs list after companies and businesses groups objected. The goods included electric and cordless snow blowers made by New Jersey-based Snow Joe said Joseph Cohen, the company’s chief executive officer.
But the list of $16bn in goods targeted for tariffs include Snow Joe tillers, garden cultivators and log splitters, and imposing duties only means higher prices for consumers and added cost and uncertainty for businesses, he said.
“Tariffs are always a tough thing to look at because unfortunately the consumer does get hurt, business like mine get hurt unintentionally in the process,” Cohen said by phone.
US soybean farmers - including from states that backed Trump in the 2016 election - are being particularly hard hit by the retaliatory duties. China is the top export market for US soybeans, accounting for almost $14bn in sales and representing nearly a third of total US soybean production in 2017, according to the American Soybean Association.
Farmers are already feeling the pain with cancelled orders and falling commodity prices, without any promised relief, said Max Baucus, a former Democratic senator from Montana and ambassador to China. He’s co-chairman of Farmers for Free Trade, a non-profit group.
“For farmers across the country, the trade war is now getting real,” Baucus said in a statement.
General Electric, one the largest US employers and exporters, tried unsuccessfully to have 34 product lines removed from the list of goods targeted for tariffs. The company has said imposing tariffs on products such as aviation and medical parts could hit American operations and jobs - including its Wisconsin-based facilities that employ 6 000 people.
“We remain concerned that these tariffs could make it harder for US manufacturers to compete in the global economy, and will shrink rather than expand US exports,” the company said in a statement. “We will work with the administration to minimize potential impact to our businesses.”
Still, there aren’t high hopes the administration will change its approach, Brzytwa of the American Chemistry Council said.
“There’s a viewpoint that’s shared across the government, and certainly at the White House, that there’s going to be pain that US industry is going to have to suffer in order to change China’s behavior,” Brzytwa said by phone. “We think that you can change China’s behavior without shooting yourself in the foot.”* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER