Musk says no-one took 'paedo' tweet seriously in bid to toss suit

accreditation

Elon Musk has asked a judge to throw out a defamation lawsuit by a British caver whom the Tesla founder called a paedophile on Twitter. Musk says it was just an over-the-top insult that wouldn’t be taken seriously by any reasonable person.

A war of words erupted between Musk and Vernon Unsworth in July after a rescue effort of a boys' soccer team in a flooded cave in Thailand. Unsworth told CNN that Musk staged a "PR stunt” by sending a mini-submarine that had "absolutely no chance of working” to help. Musk responded with a barrage of tweets, including one that said, "Sorry paedo guy, you really did ask for it.”

On Thursday, in a request to dismiss the lawsuit, Musk said his insults weren’t intended to be statements of fact but were made in the middle of a "schoolyard spat on social media." No one would reasonably believe he had private knowledge that Unsworth was attracted to children or engaged in sexual activity with them, Musk said.

"Musk’s statements were thus necessarily just imaginative attacks," Musk’s lawyers said. "Even if offensive, such speculative insults are by their nature opinion and protected by the First Amendment."

Lin Wood, Unsworth’s lawyer, said in an email that Musk "does not let the facts or well-established law get in the way of his novel but inaccurate contentions” in his request to dismiss the lawsuit. Wood said he rejects the argument that statements published on social media are protected speech.

"I am confident the trial court will likewise reject this fanciful position which, if adopted, would effectively prevent an individual from seeking redress for any and all false and defamatory attacks on reputation published on the internet,” Wood said.

Musk said he took to Twitter to defend the mini-submarine effort because he was "shocked by Unsworth’s indefensible and baseless attacks." Musk noted he apologised in two subsequent tweets, and said his implications in an email to a journalist that Unsworth was a child rapist and engaged in child sex trafficking weren’t taken literally by anyone.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.41
+1.4%
Rand - Pound
20.02
+1.5%
Rand - Euro
17.11
+1.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.61
+1.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+1.3%
Gold
1,809.37
-0.3%
Silver
25.33
-0.6%
Palladium
2,683.50
+0.8%
Platinum
1,059.00
+0.7%
Brent Crude
75.41
+0.4%
Top 40
63,015
+0.3%
All Share
69,146
+0.3%
Resource 10
71,115
+0.6%
Industrial 25
87,953
-0.1%
Financial 15
12,969
+0.5%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1514 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2343 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3704 votes
Vote