Reduction in Steinhoff shareholding a forced sale, says Christo Wiese

Johannesburg - Christo Wiese’s stake in Steinhoff International Holdings has been cut to about 6% after banks sold stock put up by the former chairperson to secure margin loans, costing him billions of dollars in losses on the scandal-hit South African retailer.

The reduction in the shareholding from 20.52% was involuntary and he doesn’t know which lenders sold or who bought the stock, Wiese said in a phone interview Monday. That’s the last of the forced disposals, and he has no plans to sell down the stake further, the billionaire said.

Wiese has emerged as one of the biggest losers in a financial scandal that’s knocked almost 90% off Steinhoff’s market valuation, or more than €11bn. The owner of Conforama in France and Mattress Firm in the US said in early December it had uncovered accounting irregularities and that Chief Executive Officer Markus Jooste quit. He was followed less than two weeks later by Wiese.

Wiese’s net worth has plunged to $2.1bn (about R25bn) from about $5bn (about R59bn), according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

The scandal has also led to a fall in the value of a stake owned by the Public Investment Corporation, a manager of South African state-worker pensions. Banks including JPMorgan Chase & Company and Nomura Holdings have booked hundreds of millions of dollars of losses related to loans and the company’s share plunge.

Wiese, 76, became Steinhoff’s largest shareholder after agreeing to sell clothing chain Pepkor to the retailer in 2014, gaining about 20% of the company at R57 a share. Steinhoff closed at R55.81 on December 1, the working day before it said it wouldn’t be able to file audited earnings. The stock traded 2% lower at R5.82 as of 1:16 pm in Johannesburg on Monday.

Pepkor still contains value, Wiese said. The bulk of that business is now part of Steinhoff Africa Retail, a company spun off by the parent company last year.

The PIC is seeking a review of South African company voting-pool arrangements and new regulations covering large personal shareholdings, representatives of the state-owned money manager said at a hearing with South African lawmakers on January 31. The PIC also said it forced Wiese to resign from Steinhoff on December 15, after the then-chairman had briefly held an executive role to replace Jooste.

The PIC’s stake is about 8%, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, meaning it’s leapfrogged Wiese to become Steinhoff’s largest shareholder. The money manager didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Wiese was also at the parliamentary hearing, and said news of the scandal came to him as “a bolt from the blue” and that he had no prior knowledge of any wrongdoing. Jooste has been reported by Steinhoff to South Africa’s anti-corruption police unit and hasn’t commented or been seen publicly since the scandal broke.

Steinhoff will have to restate its earnings for at least fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 and has hired PwC to investigate the accounting irregularities in more detail. In an emailed response to questions, the company said Wiese had notified the company of his share disposal, which was reported as 6.2% in filings he made to the Netherlands’ Authority for the Financial Markets on Friday.

Wiese said he’s currently holding 243 198 492 shares, which equates to a stake of about 5.7%, based on the amount of stock in issue.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, and I've gotten it.
24% - 76 votes
No, I did not.
53% - 171 votes
My landlord refused
24% - 76 votes