Slim hope for hundreds of tourism businesses asking for second Covid-19 relief fund

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The fund only had R200 million available thanks to funding redirected from other sources.
The fund only had R200 million available thanks to funding redirected from other sources.

The Department of Tourism is still being inundated with hundreds of pleas for help from financially distressed businesses in the industry, hoping for a second phase of last year's Covid-19 impact-related Tourism Relief Fund, but chances of this happening are slim.

The department's director-general, Victor Tharage, said in a statement "it is regrettable that, while there is still a lot of demand for the funds, the department is not in a position to reinstate the Tourism Relief Fund owing to the unavailability of financial resources". 

"It is for this reason that the focus of the department is on the implementation of the Tourism Sector Recovery Plan to ensure a sustainable return to business activities as the mainstay of the recovery efforts," added Tharage.

The enquiries currently flooding in to the department are in most cases from tourism enterprises whose applications under the fund were unsuccessful. Their applications either did not meet the criteria of the fund or there have not been enough funds available on the part of the department.

The fund only had R200 million available thanks to funding redirected from other sources.

The aim of the fund was to respond to the impact of Covid-19 on small tourism enterprises whose cash flows are largely dependent on daily activities. The funds were meant to assist with expenses like fixed and operational costs as well as supplies. Individual assistance was capped at R50 000.

Therefore, of the 7 284 valid applications submitted, only 4 000 businesses in categories such as accommodation establishments, conferencing facilities and venues, safari and car rentals in the tourism and hospitality sector received the funds. 

Only enterprises with an annual turnover of not more than R5 million could qualify for the fund. To qualify, enterprises also had to provide valid proof of, among other things, the nature of the business, status of operations and Covid-19 impact as well as financials and tax clearance status. An attempt was also made to ensure funding was spread across the various provinces. 

Businesses such as food and beverage franchises, hotel restaurants and conference centres, taverns and craft centres did not qualify for the fund.

 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.85
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
20.42
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
17.48
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.94
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,802.28
0.0%
Silver
25.18
0.0%
Palladium
2,675.50
0.0%
Platinum
1,064.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
74.10
+0.4%
Top 40
61,933
+1.0%
All Share
68,064
+1.0%
Resource 10
66,904
+1.5%
Industrial 25
89,442
+0.7%
Financial 15
12,820
+1.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1273 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2020 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3198 votes
Vote