Costly delays upset reactor renaissance, keep nuclear at bay

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
A South African media tour of Areva's manufacturing plant in France. (Photo: Matthew le Cordeur)
A South African media tour of Areva's manufacturing plant in France. (Photo: Matthew le Cordeur)

Tokyo - Costly delays, growing complexity and new safety requirements in the wake of the triple meltdown at Fukushima are conspiring to thwart a new age of nuclear reactor construction.

So-called generation III+ reactors were supposed to have simpler designs and safety features to avoid the kind of disaster seen in Japan almost six years ago. With their development, the industry heralded the dawn of a new era of cheaper, easier-to-build atomic plants.

Instead, the new reactors are running afoul of tighter regulations and unfamiliar designs, delaying completions and raising questions on whether the breakthroughs are too complex and expensive to be realised without state aid. The developments have left the industry’s pioneers, including Areva and Westinghouse, struggling to complete long-delayed projects while construction elsewhere gains pace.

Support independent journalism
Subscribe to News24 for just R75 per month to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. You can cancel any time.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Rand - Dollar
14.58
-1.9%
Rand - Pound
20.12
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
16.97
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.92
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.0%
Gold
1,782.58
+0.0%
Silver
24.14
-0.6%
Palladium
2,017.14
-2.6%
Platinum
1,053.00
+0.1%
Brent Crude
85.82
+0.9%
Top 40
59,535
-1.4%
All Share
66,058
-1.3%
Resource 10
61,431
-2.8%
Industrial 25
85,433
-0.1%
Financial 15
13,820
-1.4%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Facebook is facing a fresh crisis after a former employee turned whistle-blower leaked internal company research . Do you still use Facebook?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, the benefits outweigh the risk for me
24% - 190 votes
No, I have deleted it
47% - 377 votes
Yes, but I am considering deleting it
29% - 231 votes
Vote