Cosatu wants facts before talks on Eskom job cuts

accreditation
A Cosatu march (GALLO)
A Cosatu march (GALLO)

South Africa’s largest labour federation is prepared to discuss reducing workers at the nation’s power utility if it’s given proof of over-staffing and that job cuts would save Eskom.

Until now, proposals to turn around the debt-ridden, loss-making utility have been met with fierce opposition from labor unions.

In June, Eskom had to implement rolling blackouts when workers protested plans for zero pay increases and in February union members picketed at the company’s headquarters over potential job cuts.

"We are asking them to please table the evidence and research that indicates" that Eskom has too many workers, Bheki Ntshalintshali, general secretary of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu), said in an interview at Bloomberg’s Johannesburg office.

"When that evidence is gathered and made public, I think that will be a different game to look at because you can’t argue against facts, you can’t argue against numbers."

Neither Eskom nor the government has provided information on which specific jobs aren’t required, he said, adding Cosatu may be prepared to discuss how workers could be moved.

'No plan'

Eskom is seen by credit-rating companies as one of the biggest risks to Africa’s most-industrialised economy.

It’s struggling to meet demand for power from aging plants and to boost revenue after years of financial mismanagement. The company was at the center of alleged looting under the previous administration.

The World Bank estimates that the power utility has 66% too many employees, while Eskom has said of its 48 600 employees it has 16 000 more workers than it needs.

"How did it happen that they just employed more and more people?" Ntshalintshali said. "Clearly, there was no plan. You can’t employ people today and tomorrow you say you are overstaffed."

While President Cyril Ramaphosa has replaced the utility’s board, Cosatu wants the government to take a hard line on prosecuting those responsible for looting at state-owned companies, including Eskom.

Without setting an example by going after the alleged perpetrators and installing the right management, steps such as job cuts won’t get Eskom back to financial health, the federation said.

Ramaphosa announced in February that Eskom will be split into three units and, while he insists that the utility will not be privatised, Finance Minister Tito Mboweni said in the budget the government will invite private businesses to invest in the transmission unit.

"We are jittery because, as much as the president says there is not going to be any retrenchments or job losses, if you listen to Treasury and the public enterprises minister, these are proponents for privatisation," Cosatu First Deputy-President Michael Shingange said.

Cosatu opposes any privatization of the network because it could make electricity too expensive for the majority of poor South Africans.

"How are we going to stop them from hiking the price?" Shingange said. "It’s not only about job losses for us, it’s about the fact that electricity is already extremely unaffordable to our people. Imagine when it is in the hands of private individuals."

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.77
+0.5%
Rand - Pound
20.17
+0.6%
Rand - Euro
17.32
+0.5%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.71
+0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.8%
Gold
1,778.33
+0.2%
Silver
22.81
+1.4%
Palladium
1,939.82
+1.6%
Platinum
964.51
+0.8%
Brent Crude
74.36
+0.6%
Top 40
56,086
0.0%
All Share
62,362
0.0%
Resource 10
55,821
0.0%
Industrial 25
80,767
0.0%
Financial 15
13,883
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
What potential restrictions on unvaccinated South Africans may make the biggest difference to public health, the economy?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Limited access to restaurants and bars
11% - 90 votes
Limited access to shopping centres
16% - 131 votes
Limited access to live events, including sport matches and festivals
26% - 211 votes
Workplace vaccine mandates
47% - 388 votes
Vote