'Elephant in the room': Eskom says it can't explain why its board backed 'unlawful' tender

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Eskom wants a R8 billion fuel oil supply award made to Econ Oil to be declared invalid.
Eskom wants a R8 billion fuel oil supply award made to Econ Oil to be declared invalid.
Gallo Images

Lawyers for Eskom have acknowledged that the power utility can't explain why its board in October 2019 endorsed a decision to award an R8 billion fuel oil tender to Econ Oil which it now says is "patently unlawful".

Eskom this week went to court to have the award declared invalid and set aside. Its application was opposed by Econ Oil, which argued the award was legally binding.

But while Eskom's legal team told the court the award was clearly illegal, they didn't offer an explanation for why its board endorsed it. Advocate Wim Trengove, SC, for the power utility, described the board's conduct as the "elephant in the room". 

Support independent journalism
Subscribe to News24 for just R75 per month to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Rand - Dollar
13.72
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
19.35
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
16.62
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.58
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,877.34
0.0%
Silver
27.92
0.0%
Palladium
2,779.00
0.0%
Platinum
1,151.00
0.0%
Brent Crude
72.69
+0.2%
Top 40
61,445
+0.3%
All Share
67,724
+0.3%
Resource 10
65,776
+1.1%
Industrial 25
87,620
+0.1%
Financial 15
13,639
-0.9%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Have you noticed a difference in the voices of women compared to men in virtual meetings?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, there is a difference.
29% - 15 votes
No, I haven't noticed it.
60% - 31 votes
A bad internet connection worsens it.
12% - 6 votes
Vote