Office of Chief Justice denies Guptas influenced Molefe case date

Ajay Gupta believes the idea of state capture is an imaginary concept created by the media.
Ajay Gupta believes the idea of state capture is an imaginary concept created by the media.

Cape Town - The Office of the Chief Justice on Friday said that Ajay Gupta did not approach the Gauteng Deputy Judge President to influence the starting date of the upcoming court proceedings of former Eskom CEO Brian Molefe.

On Wednesday, suspended Eskom legal head Suzanne Daniels testified before a parliamentary inquiry that Ajay Gupta told her in July 2017 that he would move the date of Molefe's hearing to another date.

Daniels said she met the Gupta brother at an apartment near Melrose Arch in Johannesburg on July 29.

"The purpose of the discussion was around the process of the Molefe court proceedings. Mr Gupta wanted to know how far they were," Daniels told the inquiry.

She said that Ajay told her that he would speak to "someone" at the Gauteng Deputy Judge President’s office to have the hearing take place after December 2017.

Daniels said that Duduzane Zuma, Deputy Minister [of Public Enterprises] Ben Martins, a Chinese lady "whose name I could not remember" and Gupta business associate, Salim Essa, were also present at the meeting.

READ: Eskom inquiry hears evidence that the Guptas took care of Molefe and Koko

In a statement on Friday, the Office of the Chief Justice said it "unequivocally refuted" the "misleading" statement attributed to Ajay Gupta.

"In fact, that statement was allegedly made in July 2017, when pleadings had not yet been lodged."

"We can also confirm that the officials in the office of the Deputy Judge President have informed the Deputy Judge President that there has been no approach to them by anyone to have the date changed," the statement read.

"As the Office of the Chief Justice, we are not aware of any inappropriate conduct by any court officials relating to the enrolment of this and other matters and thus encourages any member of the public who may have information regarding any wrongful activity in this regard to approach the Office of the Chief Justice with such information."

Daniels, meanwhile, on Thursday tweeted that she stood by her testimony at the inquiry.

"By virtue of being a lawyer, I am an officer of the court and to top it up, I also took an oath in Parliament ahead of proffering my evidence. I, therefore, would not have lied to Parliament and risk various applicable consequences. I stand by my testimony."

The Molefe case is set to start on November 29.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATE: Get Fin24's top morning business news and opinions in your inbox.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

ZAR/USD
17.38
(-0.05)
ZAR/GBP
22.72
(-0.10)
ZAR/EUR
20.56
(-0.12)
ZAR/AUD
12.45
(-0.12)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(-0.19)
Gold
1942.90
(+0.07)
Silver
26.42
(+0.07)
Platinum
941.16
(+0.46)
Brent Crude
44.74
(-0.36)
Palladium
2104.73
(+0.41)
All Share
57077.48
(-0.60)
Top 40
52737.48
(-0.65)
Financial 15
10156.41
(-0.69)
Industrial 25
75107.47
(-0.84)
Resource 10
58926.78
(-0.40)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1011 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 6769 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1429 votes
Vote