Extending life of Koeberg financially viable for Eskom, but anti-nuclear activists doth protest

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Koeberg Power Plant. Photo: Jay Caboz
Koeberg Power Plant. Photo: Jay Caboz

Eskom's nuclear power station Koeberg is arguably one of the most reliable among its fleet. With the power utility having to decommission coal plants nearing the end of their lifespan, it makes sense that it wants to keep Koeberg running for another 20 years to ensure it can meet the energy demand.

Koeberg – located along the West Coast in Duynefontein, about 27 kilometres from Cape Town – was first connected to the electricity grid in 1984. It is the only nuclear power station in Africa and accounts for about 3.6% of SA's electricity.

Given the bad reputation nuclear power has had since World War 2, the construction of Koeberg was not without opposition. Koeberg Alert, an activist organisation, was formed in 1983 to oppose the country's nuclear programme. Later known as Koeberg Alert Alliance, the organisation now opposes the further building of reactors at Koeberg and runs other anti-nuclear campaigns.

Support independent journalism
Subscribe to News24 for just R75 per month to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. You can cancel any time.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Rand - Dollar
15.04
-1.4%
Rand - Pound
20.67
-1.3%
Rand - Euro
17.44
-1.5%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.30
-1.7%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-1.8%
Gold
1,797.17
+0.2%
Silver
24.08
-0.3%
Palladium
1,961.53
-2.4%
Platinum
1,013.50
-1.8%
Brent Crude
86.40
+0.5%
Top 40
60,874
-0.3%
All Share
67,475
-0.2%
Resource 10
63,082
-0.9%
Industrial 25
87,253
+0.1%
Financial 15
14,054
+0.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Facebook is facing a fresh crisis after a former employee turned whistle-blower leaked internal company research . Do you still use Facebook?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, the benefits outweigh the risk for me
26% - 353 votes
No, I have deleted it
44% - 587 votes
Yes, but I am considering deleting it
30% - 395 votes
Vote