IPP deal would be 'financial suicide' lawyer for Numsa tells court

accreditation

Pretoria - A lawyer for the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa argued in the North Gauteng High Court on Tuesday that the signing of a deal by power utility Eskom with 27 independent power producers (IPPs) may be financial suicide. 

Numsa, along with Transform RSA, asked the court to grant an interdict against new Energy Minister Jeff Radebe to stop him from signing the renewable energy contracts. 

The contracts were set to be signed earlier this month. But this was put on hold after Numsa and Transform SA instituted a last-minute court bid.

The Department of Energy previously said it expected the signing of the agreements to go ahead as soon as the court matter was finished.

On Tuesday advocate Nazeer Cassim, for Numsa, told the court that some might view the signing of the renewable energy contracts a form of economic looting. 

He added that Eskom was already broke and that tax payers would have to foot these bills if things didn't go as planned. 

“We are trying to avert a disaster,” he said. 

Cassim said there already was an application by the Coal Transporters Forum to have the IPP agreements nullified. He asked that an interdict stopping the signing of the agreements be granted, until that application was dealt with. 

He also told the court that the application by the Coal Transporters Forum would deal with arguments that the IPPs didn’t comply with statutory frameworks and that there was no public participation. 

READ: Last-minute court bid blocks IPP signing

Advocate Barry Roux, for Eskom, argued that the parastatal’s financial situation could not be a reason to grant an interdict. 

Roux added that a court could not grant an interdict against the signing of the IPP agreements without first reviewing and setting aside the Minister of Energy’s determination in terms of the Electricity Regulation Act. 

Advocate Wim Trengove, for the IPPs, said all due processes were followed by the National Energy Regulator (Nersa) before they were entered into.

He said the applicants couldn't argue that the procedures behind the granting of the IPPs were flawed until they brought an application to have these procedures reviewed. 

Judge Dawie Fourie will deliver judgment on Thursday.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.43
+1.3%
Rand - Pound
20.07
+1.2%
Rand - Euro
17.16
+1.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.62
+1.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+1.2%
Gold
1,810.11
-0.2%
Silver
25.47
-0.1%
Palladium
2,671.00
+0.3%
Platinum
1,061.62
+0.9%
Brent Crude
75.41
+0.4%
Top 40
62,917
+0.1%
All Share
69,069
+0.1%
Resource 10
70,980
+0.4%
Industrial 25
87,819
-0.3%
Financial 15
12,969
+0.5%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
In light of the recent looting, do you think a basic income grant is the right approach to deal with SA’s hunger and poverty problems?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It will go a long way in helping fight the symptoms of SA’s entrenched inequality, especially for those who are starving right now
20% - 1509 votes
SA’s problems are complex, and we instead need to spend that money on building and growing our economy, which will help the country in the long run
31% - 2334 votes
All grants are a problem as they foster a reliance on handouts
49% - 3693 votes
Vote