New Eskom board reveal marred by more Gupta questions

Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown. (Pic: Gallo Images)
Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown. (Pic: Gallo Images)

Johannesburg - Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown on Friday reappointed four Eskom directors who, exactly a week ago, she said she wanted to get rid of.

The four directors retained at Eskom’s annual general meeting on Friday are joined by four new nonexecutives and new acting CEO Johnny Dladla, and include chief financial officer Anoj Singh, who has become the latest Eskom boss to have his name crop up in the #GuptaLeaks scandal.

Friday’s action follows an acrimonious meeting at the end of last month, when the board refused to let an interministerial committee that Brown is part of even see the alleged legal advice the Eskom board relied on when it reappointed Brian Molefe as CEO without asking for Brown’s approval.

The whole board is now an “interim board” until Cabinet approves them next month, Brown said.

This raises the possibility that some of the retained directors may yet lose their seats.

Brown described the now nine-strong board as a “new dawn”, but has already made it clear that she has no faith in roughly half of the members.

In a replying affidavit in the labour court case relating to Molefe’s mysterious resignation or early retirement, filed on June 18, Brown said: “The only reason I have not dissolved the board is because it may have significant implications for guarantees issued by Eskom and, further, that an annual general meeting is to be held on June 23, when I have to consider whether to reappoint the directors of the board for a further term.

“It was the board’s conduct within the interministerial committee meeting on May 31 that, among other things, made me lose confidence in the board,” she said.

This implied she intended to get rid of board members at the annual general meeting on Friday, but, after the resignation of board chair Ben Ngubane last week, it seems the rest of the board is safe for now.

In her affidavit, Brown said that, by June 1, she, her staff and senior counsel had decided that the board’s behaviour regarding Molefe’s reappointment was “highly irregular”.

The repeated excuse by Eskom that Molefe had not resigned but took early retirement was also seemingly authoritatively knocked down in Brown’s eyes.

On June 6, she received an email from the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission stating that it had received notice of Molefe’s resignation in November.

Eskom then countered that this had been a “draft notice” that it had sent to the commission, which Brown said was “unsatisfactory”.

Molefe’s case will be heard in the labour court at the end of the month.


The previous acting CEO, Matshela Koko, is still on paid leave due to an investigation into Eskom contracts given to a company employing his stepdaughter.

An investigation by law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr into the Koko affair has been given to the minister, but she said she was still studying it and waiting for the Eskom board to decide what action to take.

If Koko was cleared and returns to work, he would return to his old job as head of generation, she said.

It will, however, still be quite some time before Eskom has a permanent board.

The job of CEO would be readvertised only after the Molefe case was finalised.

“I want to give South Africa someone who wasn’t conflicted by having applied for the CEO position or been named in any way,” she said of Dladla, who is a veteran at the parastatal.

“Eskom’s reputation has been severely compromised, but no allegations have been proven in court,” said Brown.

New nonexecutive board members

. Pulane Molokwane

. Simphiwe Dingaan

. Banothile Makhubela

. Sathiaseelan Gounden

Reappointed board members

. Chief financial officer Singh

. Acting chairperson Zethembe Khoza

. Pat Naidoo

. Giovanni Leonardi

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1333 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 8732 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1925 votes