Ramaphosa backs Gordhan in supporting affidavit against Public Protector

accreditation
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa arrives to the parliament in Cape Town for the 2019 State of the Nation address (NASIEF MANIE/AFP/Getty Images)
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa arrives to the parliament in Cape Town for the 2019 State of the Nation address (NASIEF MANIE/AFP/Getty Images)

President Cyril Ramaphosa has filed a supporting affidavit in the North Gauteng High Court relating to Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan's court application to suspend Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane's remedial orders.

Gordhan filed his court bid in response to Mkhwebane's controversial report relating to, among other things, the so-called 'rogue unit'. Gordhan also asked the court to interdict her office from enforcing the orders until the judicial review of her report on him was concluded.

In a statement issued on Wednesday afternoon, the Presidency said Ramaphosa had indicated his support for Gordhan's suspension application "in as far as the relief sought by the Minister relates to the president".

"The President says in his submission that it is clear from Minister Gordhan’s review application that there is a bona fide justifiable dispute between Minister Gordhan and the Public Protector over the legal validity of the Public Protector's investigations and findings and the remedial action she has directed in her report.

"Moreover, Minister Gordhan also takes issue with the tacit assumption of the Public Protector that the President has legal powers 'to take appropriate disciplinary action' against the Minister when the Minister is not appointed to the Cabinet as an employee who is subject to disciplinary action but rather as a Minister who serves at the pleasure of the President," the statement says.

Under the circumstances, Ramaphosa adds, "it would be premature for him to attempt to take 'appropriate disciplinary action' against Minister Gordhan while the principal review application is still pending and the disputes over the validity of the investigation into, and findings against, Minister Gordhan and the extent, if any, of the President’s 'disciplinary' powers over the Minister remain unresolved".

Ramaphosa also argues that any "appropriate disciplinary action" he may take against Gordhan would need to be informed by whether the investigation into Mkhwebane's findings are legally valid, and what disciplinary powers, if any, the president has over members of the Cabinet.

These issues should be determined by the North Gauteng High Court, according to Ramaphosa.

Mkhwebane's report made several findings against Gordhan. These included that SARS, under Gordhan, established an intelligence unit in violation of the South African Intelligence prescripts; that the said unit failed to follow proper procurement processes in procuring equipment; that it failed to follow proper recruitment processes; that it carried out unlawful operations; and that Gordhan himself violated the Executive Ethics Code, misleading Parliament regarding a meeting where one of the Guptas was present.

The Public Protector ordered Ramaphosa to take "appropriate disciplinary action" within 30 days of the release of her report. 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.35
-0.0%
Rand - Pound
19.81
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
17.08
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.76
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Gold
1,764.62
0.0%
Silver
25.81
0.0%
Palladium
2,467.49
0.0%
Platinum
1,038.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
73.51
+0.6%
Top 40
59,504
-1.5%
All Share
65,635
-1.4%
Resource 10
60,958
-1.7%
Industrial 25
87,956
-1.3%
Financial 15
12,995
-2.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Should government have assigned a majority shareholding in SAA to the private sector?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, It's a good decision
63% - 122 votes
Not a good move
10% - 20 votes
Too early to tell
27% - 53 votes
Vote