Be selective when investing offshore – and don’t discount South Africa

Philipp Wörz is the co-fund manager of the PSG Global Equity and Global Flexible Feeder Funds and the PSG Global Equity and Global Flexible Sub-Funds. (Picture: Supplied)
Philipp Wörz is the co-fund manager of the PSG Global Equity and Global Flexible Feeder Funds and the PSG Global Equity and Global Flexible Sub-Funds. (Picture: Supplied)

Global equities have been in a bull market ever since the 2007/8 financial crisis. With both the MSCI World Index and the S&P 500 trading at over 20 times earnings, they are well above long-term averages. 

Positive sentiment and strong returns in offshore markets may act as a lure for wary South African investors. But the case for cheap offshore equity valuations – and corresponding opportunities for strong long-term returns – is becoming weaker by the day.

Low valuations and conditions of fear usually create the best opportunities for long-term investments

This improves the chances of finding potential “bargains”: quality companies trading at discounts due to general market pessimism.

Yet most market participants repeatedly expose themselves to equities (and other risk assets) when visibility of the future is relatively clear and sentiment is strong, with little regard for valuations.

Currently, levels of investor complacency and market valuations are high. This is best illustrated by the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (widely known as the VIX), which reflects expectations of the future volatility of the S&P 500 – and therefore gives an indication of fear or complacency in the market. 

When the VIX is low, investors expect stability (and vice-versa). Recently, the VIX, which has been in existence since 1990, hit an all-time low. 

A different view on risk – and South Africa as an investment destination

A textbook explanation of risk may lead you to believe that share price volatility makes stocks risky. However, risk should really be defined as the potential for permanent capital loss. 

As such, be careful about moving assets offshore indiscriminately, a trend that is visible in the current market.

Many ordinary South Africans and other market participants are fearful and uncertain of the local economic outlook, and have “rushed for the exit door” to invest money offshore. 

While this may feel like a safer option, the reality is that current fear and uncertainty are creating an environment for attractive long-term investment returns.

That being said, there are still attractive opportunities to be found across the globe despite the rise in overall market valuations. 

In many cases, these opportunities will not leave the average investor feeling “warm and fuzzy” – many of them are in unloved parts of the market that offer a greater chance of mispricing. 

In addition to emerging markets such as South Africa, there are great opportunities in areas such as agricultural commodities, US retail and UK domestic industrials.

The attractiveness of cash

Against a backdrop of high valuations and low levels of fear, cash is often an attractive asset class as it provides firepower when market sentiment and valuations mean-revert (move back to average levels). 

Accordingly, cash levels in the PSG Global Flexible Fund increased to roughly 30% of the fund over the past 12 months. 

In addition, although the average P/E ratio of the holdings in the fund has crept up slightly to 15.5 times, the earnings of these companies are still relatively low and provide good scope for growth. 

Philipp Wörz is the co-fund manager of the PSG Global Equity and Global Flexible Feeder Funds and the PSG Global Equity and Global Flexible Sub-Funds.

ZAR/USD
17.42
(+0.10)
ZAR/GBP
22.77
(+0.02)
ZAR/EUR
20.59
(-0.00)
ZAR/AUD
12.46
(+0.38)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.28)
Gold
1952.30
(+1.67)
Silver
27.44
(+7.13)
Platinum
960.00
(+3.27)
Brent Crude
45.32
(+2.09)
Palladium
2175.50
(+1.97)
All Share
57419.46
(+0.00)
Top 40
53082.08
(-0.08)
Financial 15
10227.06
(+0.86)
Industrial 25
75743.15
(-0.61)
Resource 10
59161.88
(+0.29)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 989 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 6591 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
15% - 1382 votes
Vote