Cash trending towards trash

Percent Down Arrow isolated on white background. 3

Investors and advisers will need to look beyond the perceived safety of money market funds for attractive real returns.


During the mid- to late-2000s and then more recently from January 2015 to date, South African investors could invest in the money market and earn an attractive real return with little risk to their capital. The more recent period of positive real money market returns coincided with a period of disappointing returns from growth assets (equities and property), with the result that more and more investors switched their growth asset exposure to cash. This action has only accelerated after the recent equity market collapse.

Some observations

The SA repurchase (repo) rate is the key monetary policy tool used by the SA Reserve Bank (SARB) to control inflation. As inflation rises (or is predicted to), so the SARB responds by raising the repo rate, and as inflation falls (or is predicted to) the bank responds by cutting the rate.

As the repo rate rises, so returns from money market investments also rise, and vice versa. Note that the average money market fund return lags that of the repo rate. Importantly, the 250-basis point cut in the repo rate made during the Covid-19 lockdown is yet to reflect in the performance of the average money market fund. This means that money market returns will fall from here.

The average money market fund return peaks where the repo rate peaks and bottoms where the repo rate bottoms. We can therefore expect annualised money market fund returns to trend down towards the current repo rate of 3.75%. Over the full period for which the SARB has implemented inflation targeting, the money market has delivered an average real return of 1.9%.

It is instructive to consider what happened in the period after the global financial crisis (GFC), which introduced a lengthy period (approximately five years) of negative real returns for money market fund investors (see graph 1). Could it serve as a warning for the likely path of real money market fund returns? We think so.

finweek
Source: Ninety One benchmark database.

To restimulate economies after the GFC, central banks around the world, including the SARB, anchored interest rates at record low levels. In the subsequent years, money market returns fell to levels where investors were guaranteed negative real returns, encompassing the first half of the last decade. This was because policymakers were more concerned with stimulating economic growth at the expense of wanting to contain inflation, which, interestingly, never materialised.

And now history is repeating itself. In response to the devastating consequences of Covid-19, central banks around the world are once again responding by cutting interest rates to record lows (in some countries interest rates are at zero or negative). 

The SARB’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) has acted similarly by announcing two 100-basis points cuts and a 50-basis points cut in the repo rate during the Covid-19 pandemic. These actions have reduced the repo rate to 3.75%. They were also the first moves of more than 25 basis points by the MPC in many years, illustrating the seriousness with which they view the current crisis. 

Given what we have observed above, we can expect the average money market fund return to trend towards 3.75%.


Deciding what matters most

This will mean that financial advisers and investors will need to look beyond the perceived safety of money market funds to deliver attractive real returns. I say “perceived safety” because cash will increasingly prove to be a poor investment in preserving the purchasing power of your money over the longer term.

Over the last ten years many components of inflation (electricity, health costs, education and petrol) have increased by more than the return achieved by the average money market fund (see graph 2). So, anyone invested in the average money market fund would have been spending a greater portion of their income on these necessities, which they would have had to subsidise from other sources (if possible) as their money market fund investment has not kept pace with these increases.

finweek
Source: Bloomberg, Morningstar to 31 December 2019.

However, conservative investors will face a dilemma, as higher real returns will come at a price, including capital security and recommended investment term. Investors must therefore satisfy themselves that the trade-off is worthwhile.

Conservative investors with an investment time horizon of greater than a year could consider a fund where the portfolio managers have a far broader investment universe from which to choose, such as the Ninety One Diversified Income Fund. It means they can diversify risk while potentially earning returns in excess of money market rates – in essence, seek to generate real returns (participate) while managing downside risk (protect).

Paul Hutchinson is the sales manager at Ninety One.

Read more
This article originally appeared in the Fund Focus supplement in the 25 June edition of finweekBuy and download the magazine here or subscribe to our newsletter here.
finweek, june, 2020

ZAR/USD
17.29
(+0.21)
ZAR/GBP
22.72
(-0.09)
ZAR/EUR
20.55
(-0.25)
ZAR/AUD
12.46
(-0.08)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.13)
Gold
2038.63
(+0.47)
Silver
26.95
(+3.00)
Platinum
968.00
(+3.70)
Brent Crude
44.34
(+0.63)
Palladium
2174.99
(+2.19)
All Share
57629.36
(+2.45)
Top 40
53279.30
(+2.56)
Financial 15
9928.97
(+0.51)
Industrial 25
76162.43
(+1.63)
Resource 10
59790.27
(+4.30)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 875 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
74% - 5792 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
15% - 1161 votes
Vote